WP2 1 Evaluation Strategy Design » History » Version 1
Steve Welburn, 2012-08-08 02:53 PM
| 1 | 1 | Steve Welburn | h1. WP2.1 Evaluation Strategy Design |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 1 | Steve Welburn | |
| 3 | 1 | Steve Welburn | In order to evaluate the training materials, it is necessary to: |
| 4 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * identify the learning objectives which they aim to meet |
| 5 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * evaluate whether those learning objectives satisfy the overall purpose of the course |
| 6 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * evaluate whether the materials meet those learning objectives |
| 7 | 1 | Steve Welburn | |
| 8 | 1 | Steve Welburn | h2. Methods of Evaluation |
| 9 | 1 | Steve Welburn | |
| 10 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Informal / Formal Review |
| 11 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Post-course questionnaire |
| 12 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Medium-term review of usefulness of course content / adoption |
| 13 | 1 | Steve Welburn | |
| 14 | 1 | Steve Welburn | Content |
| 15 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Target audience - level & utilization |
| 16 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Reading level |
| 17 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Correctness of content (current, accurate) |
| 18 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Instructional components |
| 19 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Essential information vs elaborations |
| 20 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Well-organized, logical |
| 21 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Well illustrated (quantity, quality) |
| 22 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Without propaganda or bias |
| 23 | 1 | Steve Welburn | |
| 24 | 1 | Steve Welburn | Format |
| 25 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Equipment & infrastructure requirements |
| 26 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Quality, wear & tear, practical |
| 27 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Ease of use (instructional components) |
| 28 | 1 | Steve Welburn | * Overall attractivenesss |
| 29 | 1 | Steve Welburn | |
| 30 | 1 | Steve Welburn | h2. Tools |
| 31 | 1 | Steve Welburn | |
| 32 | 1 | Steve Welburn | "Bristol Online Surveys":http://www.survey.bris.ac.uk/ |