Sound Data Management Training » History » Version 83

Steve Welburn, 2012-09-25 12:11 PM

1 5 Steve Welburn
h1. WP1.2 Online Training Material
2 1 Steve Welburn
3 9 Steve Welburn
{{>toc}}
4 9 Steve Welburn
5 68 Steve Welburn
We consider three stages of a research project, and the appropriate research data management considerations for each of those stages. The stages are:
6 75 Steve Welburn
* [[Before The Research|before the research]];
7 75 Steve Welburn
* [[During The Research|during the research]];
8 75 Steve Welburn
* [[At The End Of The Research|at the end of the research]].
9 1 Steve Welburn
10 75 Steve Welburn
In addition, we consider the [[Research Management|responsibilities of a Principal Investigator]] regarding data management.
11 75 Steve Welburn
12 77 Steve Welburn
{{include(Data Management By Research Stage)}}
13 44 Steve Welburn
14 82 Steve Welburn
h2. Why manage research data ?
15 82 Steve Welburn
16 82 Steve Welburn
Funder requirements: http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/208596/
17 82 Steve Welburn
18 83 Steve Welburn
Ponemon reports for Intel on the "Lost Laptop problem" ~10% of Education and Research laptops are lost during their lifetime.
19 83 Steve Welburn
20 83 Steve Welburn
PC World study on laptop failure rates: 20-30% of laptops with a significant failure
21 83 Steve Welburn
22 83 Steve Welburn
h3. Failure Trends In A Large Disk Drive Population
23 83 Steve Welburn
24 83 Steve Welburn
FAST '07 paper on "Failure Trends In A Large Disk Drive Population":https://www.usenix.org/conference/fast-07/failure-trends-large-disk-drive-population
25 83 Steve Welburn
26 83 Steve Welburn
Google report on over 100,000 consumer-grade disk drives from 80-400 GB produced in or after 2001 and used within Google. Data collected December 2005 - August 2006. Disk drives had a burn-in process and only those that were commissioned for use were included in the study - certain basic defects may well be excluded from this report.
27 83 Steve Welburn
28 83 Steve Welburn
Hard drive manufacturers often quote yearly failure rates below 2% [2]
29 83 Steve Welburn
User studies have seen rates as high as 6% [9]
30 83 Steve Welburn
31 83 Steve Welburn
Between 15-60% of drives returned to manufacturers having been considered to have failed by users have no defect as far as the manufacturers are concerned [7]
32 83 Steve Welburn
Between 20-30% “no problem found” cases were observed after analyzing failed drives from a study of 3477 disks [11]
33 83 Steve Welburn
34 83 Steve Welburn
bq. the most accurate definition we can present of a failure event for our study is: a drive is considered to have failed if it was replaced as part of a repairs procedure. Note that this definition implicitly excludes drives that were replaced due to an upgrade.
35 83 Steve Welburn
36 83 Steve Welburn
37 8 Steve Welburn
h2. Overarching concerns
38 8 Steve Welburn
39 8 Steve Welburn
Human participation - ethics, data protection
40 10 Steve Welburn
41 10 Steve Welburn
Audio data - copyright
42 20 Steve Welburn
43 21 Steve Welburn
Storage - where ? how ? SLA ?
44 20 Steve Welburn
45 21 Steve Welburn
Short-term resilient storage for work-in-progress
46 1 Steve Welburn
47 1 Steve Welburn
Long-term archival storage for research data outputs
48 21 Steve Welburn
49 21 Steve Welburn
Curation of archived data - refreshing media and formats
50 1 Steve Welburn
51 1 Steve Welburn
Drivers - FoI, RCUK