Mercurial > hg > webaudioevaluationtool
changeset 724:baa1535e2363
Added section/feature requests regarding remote testing
author | Brecht De Man <BrechtDeMan@users.noreply.github.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:11:04 +0200 |
parents | 464ca23d5f39 |
children | 16bafae452a8 |
files | docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.pdf docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.tex |
diffstat | 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.tex Thu Sep 24 09:52:08 2015 +0100 +++ b/docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.tex Thu Sep 24 12:11:04 2015 +0200 @@ -128,6 +128,29 @@ \section{Architecture} A slightly technical overview of the system. Talk about XML, JavaScript, Web Audio API, HTML5. + Describe and/or visualise audioholder-audioelement-... structure. + + Streaming audio? + + +\section{Remote tests} + The following features allow easy and effective remote testing: + \begin{itemize} + \item PHP script to collect result XML files + \item Randomly pick specified number of audioholders + \item Functionality to participate multiple times + \begin{itemize} + \item Possible to log in with unique ID (no password) + \item Pick `new user' (need new, unique ID) or `already participated' (need already available ID) + \item Store XML on server with IDs plus which audioholders have already been listened to + \item Don't show `post-test' survey after first time + \item Pick `new' audioholders if available + \item Copy survey information first time to new XMLs + \end{itemize} + \item Intermediate saves + \item Collect IP address information (privacy issues?) --> geo-related API? + \end{itemize} + \section{Interfaces} We could add more interfaces, such as: @@ -198,6 +221,7 @@ \item Distribution plots of any radio button and number questions (drop-down menu with `pretest', `posttest', ...; then drop-down menu with question `IDs' like `gender', `age', ...; make pie chart/histogram of these values over selected range of XMLs) \item All `comments' on a specific audioelement \item A `download' button for a nice CSV of various things (values, survey responses, comments) people might want to use for analysis, e.g. when XML scares them + \item Validation of setup XMLs (easily spot `errors', like duplicate IDs or URLs, missing/dangling tags, ...) \end{itemize} A subset of the above would already be nice for this paper.