Mercurial > hg > webaudioevaluationtool

changeset 721:5e1c7b375900

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
Update to Paper inc. References
author Dave <djmoffat@users.noreply.github.com>
date Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:19:30 +0100
parents 735c5bfc66c3
children 964feb6c2065
files docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.bib docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.pdf docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.tex
diffstat 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.bib	Wed Sep 23 09:13:38 2015 +0100
+++ b/docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.bib	Wed Sep 23 10:19:30 2015 +0100
@@ -1,13 +1,143 @@
 %% This BibTeX bibliography file was created using BibDesk.
 %% http://bibdesk.sourceforge.net/
 
-%% Created for Dave at 2015-09-23 09:11:50 +0100 
+%% Created for Dave at 2015-09-23 10:10:03 +0100 
 
 
 %% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8) 
 
 
 
+@article{lipshitz1981great,
+	Author = {Lipshitz, Stanley P and Vanderkooy, John},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 09:09:51 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 09:09:51 +0000},
+	Journal = {Journal of the Audio Engineering Society},
+	Number = {7/8},
+	Pages = {482--491},
+	Publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
+	Title = {The great debate: Subjective evaluation},
+	Volume = {29},
+	Year = {1981}}
+
+@article{clark1982high,
+	Author = {Clark, David},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 09:07:19 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 09:07:19 +0000},
+	Journal = {Journal of the Audio Engineering Society},
+	Number = {5},
+	Pages = {330--338},
+	Publisher = {Audio Engineering Society},
+	Title = {High-resolution subjective testing using a double-blind comparator},
+	Volume = {30},
+	Year = {1982}}
+
+@book{carroll1969individual,
+	Author = {Carroll, J Douglas},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 09:01:03 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 09:01:03 +0000},
+	Publisher = {Bell Telephone Labs.},
+	Title = {Individual differences and multidimensional scaling},
+	Year = {1969}}
+
+@article{pascoe1983evaluation,
+	Author = {Pascoe, Gregory C and Attkisson, C Clifford},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 08:59:38 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 08:59:38 +0000},
+	Journal = {Evaluation and program planning},
+	Number = {3},
+	Pages = {335--347},
+	Publisher = {Elsevier},
+	Title = {The evaluation ranking scale: a new methodology for assessing satisfaction},
+	Volume = {6},
+	Year = {1983}}
+
+@book{david1963method,
+	Author = {David, Herbert Aron},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 08:58:19 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 08:58:19 +0000},
+	Publisher = {DTIC Document},
+	Title = {The method of paired comparisons},
+	Volume = {12},
+	Year = {1963}}
+
+@inproceedings{zacharov1999round,
+	Author = {Zacharov, Nick and Huopaniemi, Jyri and H{\"a}m{\"a}l{\"a}inen, Matti},
+	Booktitle = {Audio Engineering Society Conference: 16th International Conference: Spatial Sound Reproduction},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 08:53:31 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 08:53:31 +0000},
+	Organization = {Audio Engineering Society},
+	Title = {Round robin subjective evaluation of virtual home theatre sound systems at the AES 16th international conference},
+	Year = {1999}}
+
+@article{likert1932technique,
+	Author = {Likert, Rensis},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 08:49:36 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 08:49:36 +0000},
+	Journal = {Archives of psychology},
+	Title = {A technique for the measurement of attitudes.},
+	Year = {1932}}
+
+@book{nunnally1967psychometric,
+	Author = {Nunnally, Jum C and Bernstein, Ira H and Berge, Jos MF ten},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 08:43:17 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 08:43:17 +0000},
+	Publisher = {McGraw-Hill New York},
+	Title = {Psychometric theory},
+	Volume = {226},
+	Year = {1967}}
+
+@article{recommendation19971116,
+	Author = {Recommendation, ITURBS},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 08:36:37 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 08:36:37 +0000},
+	Journal = {International Telecommunication Union, Geneva},
+	Title = {1116-1: Methods for the subjective assessment of small impairments in audio systems including multichannel sound systems},
+	Year = {1997}}
+
+@article{recommendation20031534,
+	Author = {Recommendation, ITURBS},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 08:34:26 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 08:34:41 +0000},
+	Journal = {International Telecommunication Union},
+	Title = {BS. 1534-1: Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality levels of coding systems},
+	Year = {2003}}
+
+@article{recommendation2001bs,
+	Author = {Recommendation, ITUR},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 08:33:38 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 08:33:38 +0000},
+	Journal = {International Telecommunications Union, Geneva},
+	Title = {BS. 1534-1. Method for the Subjective Assessment of Intermediate Sound Quality (MUSHRA)},
+	Year = {2001}}
+
+@article{rec1997bs,
+	Author = {Rec, ITUR},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 08:32:42 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 08:32:42 +0000},
+	Journal = {International Telecommunications Union},
+	Title = {BS. 562-3,`Subjective Assessment of Sound Quality'},
+	Year = {1997}}
+
+@article{peryam1952advanced,
+	Author = {Peryam, David R and Girardot, Norman F},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 08:31:32 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 08:31:32 +0000},
+	Journal = {Food Engineering},
+	Number = {7},
+	Pages = {58--61},
+	Title = {Advanced taste-test method},
+	Volume = {24},
+	Year = {1952}}
+
+@article{rec1996p,
+	Author = {Rec, ITUT},
+	Date-Added = {2015-09-23 08:30:24 +0000},
+	Date-Modified = {2015-09-23 08:30:24 +0000},
+	Journal = {International Telecommunication Union, Geneva},
+	Title = {P. 800: Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality},
+	Year = {1996}}
+
 @inproceedings{gribben2015toward,
 	Author = {Gribben, Christopher and Lee, Hyunkook},
 	Booktitle = {Audio Engineering Society Convention 138},
Binary file docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.pdf has changed
--- a/docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.tex	Wed Sep 23 09:13:38 2015 +0100
+++ b/docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.tex	Wed Sep 23 10:19:30 2015 +0100
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
 % without further effort on your part as the last section in
 % the body of your article BEFORE References or any Appendices.
 
-\numberofauthors{4} %  in this sample file, there are a *total*
+\numberofauthors{5} %  in this sample file, there are a *total*
 % of EIGHT authors. SIX appear on the 'first-page' (for formatting
 % reasons) and the remaining two appear in the \additionalauthors section.
 %
@@ -132,18 +132,16 @@
 \section{Interfaces}
 	We could add more interfaces, such as: 
 	\begin{itemize}
-		\item Hedonic Scale
 		\item Multi attribute ratings
-		\item MUSHRA (ITU-R BS. 1534)
+		\item MUSHRA (ITU-R BS. 1534)~\cite{recommendation20031534}
+		\item Interval Scale~\cite{zacharov1999round}
+		\item Rank Scale~\cite{pascoe1983evaluation}
 		
-		\item Interval Scale
-		\item Rank Scale
-		
-		\item 2D Plane rating - e.g. Valence vs. Arousal
-		\item Likert scale
+		\item 2D Plane rating - e.g. Valence vs. Arousal~\cite{carroll1969individual}
+		\item Likert scale~\cite{likert1932technique}
 		
 		\item {\bf All the following are the interfaces available in HULTI-GEN~\cite{gribben2015toward} }
-		\item ABC/HR (ITU-R BS. 1116)
+		\item ABC/HR (ITU-R BS. 1116)~\cite{recommendation19971116}
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item Continuous Scale (5-1) Imperceptible, Perceptible but not annoying, slightly annoying, annoying, very annoying. (default Inaudible?)
 		\end{itemize}
@@ -151,27 +149,27 @@
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item Scale -50 to 50 on Mushra with default values as 0 in middle and a comparison ``Reference'' to compare to 0 value
 		\end{itemize}
-		\item Absolute Category Rating (ACR) Scale
+		\item Absolute Category Rating (ACR) Scale~\cite{rec1996p}
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item 5 point Scale - Bad, Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent (Default fair?)
 		\end{itemize}
-		\item Degredation Category Rating (DCR) Scale
+		\item Degredation Category Rating (DCR) Scale~\cite{rec1996p}
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item 5 point Scale - Inaudible, Audible but not annoying, slightly annoying, annoying, very annoying. (default Inaudible?) - {\it Basically just quantised ABC/HR?}
 		\end{itemize}
-		\item Comparison Category Rating (CCR) Scale
+		\item Comparison Category Rating (CCR) Scale~\cite{rec1996p}
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item 7 point scale: Much Better, Better, Slightly Better, About the same, slightly worse, worse, much worse - Default about the same with reference to compare to
 		\end{itemize}
-		\item 9 Point Hedonic Category Rating Scale
+		\item 9 Point Hedonic Category Rating Scale~\cite{peryam1952advanced}
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item 9 point scale: Like Extremely, Like Very Much, Like Moderate, Like Slightly, Neither Like nor Dislike, dislike Extremely, dislike Very Much, dislike Moderate, dislike Slightly  - Default Neither Like nor Dislike with reference to compare to
 		\end{itemize}
-		\item ITU-R 5 Point Continuous Impairment Scale
+		\item ITU-R 5 Point Continuous Impairment Scale~\cite{rec1997bs}
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item 5 point Scale (5-1) Imperceptible, Perceptible but not annoying, slightly annoying, annoying, very annoying. (default Inaudible?)- {\it Basically just quantised ABC/HR, or Different named DCR}
 		\end{itemize}
-		\item Pairwise Comparison (Better/Worse)
+		\item Pairwise Comparison (Better/Worse)~\cite{david1963method}
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item 2 point Scale - Better or Worse - (not sure how to default this - they default everything to better, which is an interesting choice)
 		\end{itemize}
@@ -179,8 +177,8 @@
 	
 	There are also the following interfaces, which would require a slightly different `engine' underneath, e.g. loading a different page for every possible pair. 
 	\begin{itemize}
-		\item AB Test
-		\item ABX Test
+		\item AB Test~\cite{lipshitz1981great}
+		\item ABX Test~\cite{clark1982high}
 		\item JND
 	\end{itemize}