comparison docs/WAC2016/WAC2016.tex @ 1948:a14124d3578b

Paper: outline, minor edits

 \documentclass{sig-alternate}
-
 
 \begin{document}
 
 % Copyright
 \setcopyright{waclicense}

 % \additionalauthors command.
 % These 'additional authors' will be output/set for you
 % without further effort on your part as the last section in
 % the body of your article BEFORE References or any Appendices.
 
+% FIVE authors instead of four, to leave space between first two authors.
 \numberofauthors{5} %  in this sample file, there are a *total*
 % of EIGHT authors. SIX appear on the 'first-page' (for formatting
 % reasons) and the remaining two appear in the \additionalauthors section.
 %
 \author{

 % e-mail address with \email.
 %
 % 1st. author
 \alignauthor Nicholas Jillings\\
        \email{[e-mail]}
-       \alignauthor  % dummy author for nicer spacing
+ % dummy author for nicer spacing
+ \alignauthor 
 % 2nd. author
 \alignauthor Brecht De Man\\
        \email{[e-mail]}
 \and  % use '\and' if you need 'another row' of author names
 % 3rd. author
 \alignauthor David Moffat\\
        \email{[e-mail]}
 % 4th. author
 \alignauthor Joshua D. Reiss\\
 \email{[e-mail]}
-\and
+\and % new line for address
        \affaddr{Centre for Digital Music}\\
        \affaddr{School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science}\\
        \affaddr{Queen Mary University of London}\\
        \affaddr{Mile End Road,}
        \affaddr{London E1 4NS}\\

 
 
 \section{Introduction}
 	Introducing the paper. Referring to \cite{waet}. Talking about what we do in the various sections of this paper. Pointing out that the header of the paper kind of looks like the Bat-sign. 
 	
-\section{Architecture}
+	Situating the Web Audio Evaluation Tool between other currently available evaluation tools, ...
+	
+	% only browser-based? 
+	\begin{table*}[htdp]
+        \caption{Table with existing listening test platforms and their features}
+        \begin{center}
+        	\begin{tabular}{|*{6}{l|}}
+        		\hline
+        		\textbf{Name} 	& \textbf{Ref.} 	& \textbf{Language} 	& \textbf{Interfaces} 			& \textbf{Remote} 			& \textbf{Programming} 	\\
+        		\hline
+        		APE 			& \cite{ape}		& MATLAB				& multiple stimulus one axis 	& 							& \checkmark			\\
+        		BeaqleJS		& \cite{beaqlejs}	& JavaScript			& 								& not natively supported 	& \\
+        		HULTI-GEN 		& \cite{hultigen}	& MAX 					& 								& 							& \\
+        		\textbf{WAET}	& \cite{waet}		& JavaScript			& \textbf{all of the above}		& \checkmark				& \\
+        		\hline
+        	\end{tabular}
+        \end{center}
+        \label{tab:toolboxes}
+        \end{table*}%
+
+        % about BeaqleJS
+        ... However, BeaqleJS \cite{beaqlejs} does not make use of the Web Audio API, %requires programming knowledge... 
+
+        % 
+        Selling points: remote tests, visualisaton, create your own test in the browser, many interfaces
+
+	
+\section{Architecture}  % title? 'back end'?
 	A slightly technical overview of the system. Talk about XML, JavaScript, Web Audio API, HTML5. 
-	Describe and/or visualise audioholder-audioelement-... structure.
-	
-	Streaming audio? 
-	
-	
-\section{Remote tests}
+	Describe and/or visualise audioholder-audioelement-... structure. 
+
+	% see also SMC12
+	
+	Streaming audio? % probably not, unless it's easy
+
+	Compatibility? 
+	
+	
+\section{Remote tests} % with previous? 
 	The following features allow easy and effective remote testing: 
 	\begin{itemize}
 		\item PHP script to collect result XML files
 		\item Randomly pick specified number of audioholders
 		\item Functionality to participate multiple times

 		\item Intermediate saves
 		\item Collect IP address information (privacy issues?) --> geo-related API? 
 	\end{itemize}
 
 	
-\section{Interfaces}
+\section{Interfaces} % title? 'Front end'? % Dave
+	`Build your own test'
+
 	We could add more interfaces, such as: 
 	\begin{itemize}
+		\item (APE style) \cite{ape}
 		\item Multi attribute ratings
 		\item MUSHRA (ITU-R BS. 1534)~\cite{recommendation20031534}
 		\item Interval Scale~\cite{zacharov1999round}
 		\item Rank Scale~\cite{pascoe1983evaluation}
 		
 		\item 2D Plane rating - e.g. Valence vs. Arousal~\cite{carroll1969individual}
 		\item Likert scale~\cite{likert1932technique}
 		
-		\item {\bf All the following are the interfaces available in HULTI-GEN~\cite{gribben2015toward} }
+		\item {\bf All the following are the interfaces available in HULTI-GEN~\cite{hultigen} }
 		\item ABC/HR (ITU-R BS. 1116)~\cite{recommendation19971116}
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item Continuous Scale (5-1) Imperceptible, Perceptible but not annoying, slightly annoying, annoying, very annoying. (default Inaudible?)
 		\end{itemize}
 		\item -50 to 50 Bipolar with Ref

 
 	A subset of the above would already be nice for this paper. 
 	
 	Some pictures here please. 
 
-\section{Concluding remarks}
+\section{Concluding remarks and future work}
 	Perhaps an `engineering brief' such as this one doesn't really have a lot of conclusion, except `We made this'. 
 	
 	You can check it out at \url{code.soundsoftware.ac.uk/projects/webaudioevaluationtool}. 
 	
-\section{Future work}
-	Perhaps here, perhaps not. Talking a little bit about what else might happen. Unless we really want to wrap this up. 
+	Talking a little bit about what else might happen. Unless we really want to wrap this up. 
+
+	Use \cite{schoeffler2015mushra} as a `checklist'.
 
 %
 % The following two commands are all you need in the
 % initial runs of your .tex file to
 % produce the bibliography for the citations in your paper.