annotate src/fftw-3.3.8/doc/upgrading.texi @ 82:d0c2a83c1364

Add FFTW 3.3.8 source, and a Linux build
author Chris Cannam
date Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:52:55 +0000
parents
children
rev   line source
Chris@82 1 @node Upgrading from FFTW version 2, Installation and Customization, Calling FFTW from Legacy Fortran, Top
Chris@82 2 @chapter Upgrading from FFTW version 2
Chris@82 3
Chris@82 4 In this chapter, we outline the process for updating codes designed for
Chris@82 5 the older FFTW 2 interface to work with FFTW 3. The interface for FFTW
Chris@82 6 3 is not backwards-compatible with the interface for FFTW 2 and earlier
Chris@82 7 versions; codes written to use those versions will fail to link with
Chris@82 8 FFTW 3. Nor is it possible to write ``compatibility wrappers'' to
Chris@82 9 bridge the gap (at least not efficiently), because FFTW 3 has different
Chris@82 10 semantics from previous versions. However, upgrading should be a
Chris@82 11 straightforward process because the data formats are identical and the
Chris@82 12 overall style of planning/execution is essentially the same.
Chris@82 13
Chris@82 14 Unlike FFTW 2, there are no separate header files for real and complex
Chris@82 15 transforms (or even for different precisions) in FFTW 3; all interfaces
Chris@82 16 are defined in the @code{<fftw3.h>} header file.
Chris@82 17
Chris@82 18 @heading Numeric Types
Chris@82 19
Chris@82 20 The main difference in data types is that @code{fftw_complex} in FFTW 2
Chris@82 21 was defined as a @code{struct} with macros @code{c_re} and @code{c_im}
Chris@82 22 for accessing the real/imaginary parts. (This is binary-compatible with
Chris@82 23 FFTW 3 on any machine except perhaps for some older Crays in single
Chris@82 24 precision.) The equivalent macros for FFTW 3 are:
Chris@82 25
Chris@82 26 @example
Chris@82 27 #define c_re(c) ((c)[0])
Chris@82 28 #define c_im(c) ((c)[1])
Chris@82 29 @end example
Chris@82 30
Chris@82 31 This does not work if you are using the C99 complex type, however,
Chris@82 32 unless you insert a @code{double*} typecast into the above macros
Chris@82 33 (@pxref{Complex numbers}).
Chris@82 34
Chris@82 35 Also, FFTW 2 had an @code{fftw_real} typedef that was an alias for
Chris@82 36 @code{double} (in double precision). In FFTW 3 you should just use
Chris@82 37 @code{double} (or whatever precision you are employing).
Chris@82 38
Chris@82 39 @heading Plans
Chris@82 40
Chris@82 41 The major difference between FFTW 2 and FFTW 3 is in the
Chris@82 42 planning/execution division of labor. In FFTW 2, plans were found for a
Chris@82 43 given transform size and type, and then could be applied to @emph{any}
Chris@82 44 arrays and for @emph{any} multiplicity/stride parameters. In FFTW 3,
Chris@82 45 you specify the particular arrays, stride parameters, etcetera when
Chris@82 46 creating the plan, and the plan is then executed for @emph{those} arrays
Chris@82 47 (unless the guru interface is used) and @emph{those} parameters
Chris@82 48 @emph{only}. (FFTW 2 had ``specific planner'' routines that planned for
Chris@82 49 a particular array and stride, but the plan could still be used for
Chris@82 50 other arrays and strides.) That is, much of the information that was
Chris@82 51 formerly specified at execution time is now specified at planning time.
Chris@82 52
Chris@82 53 Like FFTW 2's specific planner routines, the FFTW 3 planner overwrites
Chris@82 54 the input/output arrays unless you use @code{FFTW_ESTIMATE}.
Chris@82 55
Chris@82 56 FFTW 2 had separate data types @code{fftw_plan}, @code{fftwnd_plan},
Chris@82 57 @code{rfftw_plan}, and @code{rfftwnd_plan} for complex and real one- and
Chris@82 58 multi-dimensional transforms, and each type had its own @samp{destroy}
Chris@82 59 function. In FFTW 3, all plans are of type @code{fftw_plan} and all are
Chris@82 60 destroyed by @code{fftw_destroy_plan(plan)}.
Chris@82 61
Chris@82 62 Where you formerly used @code{fftw_create_plan} and @code{fftw_one} to
Chris@82 63 plan and compute a single 1d transform, you would now use
Chris@82 64 @code{fftw_plan_dft_1d} to plan the transform. If you used the generic
Chris@82 65 @code{fftw} function to execute the transform with multiplicity
Chris@82 66 (@code{howmany}) and stride parameters, you would now use the advanced
Chris@82 67 interface @code{fftw_plan_many_dft} to specify those parameters. The
Chris@82 68 plans are now executed with @code{fftw_execute(plan)}, which takes all
Chris@82 69 of its parameters (including the input/output arrays) from the plan.
Chris@82 70
Chris@82 71 In-place transforms no longer interpret their output argument as scratch
Chris@82 72 space, nor is there an @code{FFTW_IN_PLACE} flag. You simply pass the
Chris@82 73 same pointer for both the input and output arguments. (Previously, the
Chris@82 74 output @code{ostride} and @code{odist} parameters were ignored for
Chris@82 75 in-place transforms; now, if they are specified via the advanced
Chris@82 76 interface, they are significant even in the in-place case, although they
Chris@82 77 should normally equal the corresponding input parameters.)
Chris@82 78
Chris@82 79 The @code{FFTW_ESTIMATE} and @code{FFTW_MEASURE} flags have the same
Chris@82 80 meaning as before, although the planning time will differ. You may also
Chris@82 81 consider using @code{FFTW_PATIENT}, which is like @code{FFTW_MEASURE}
Chris@82 82 except that it takes more time in order to consider a wider variety of
Chris@82 83 algorithms.
Chris@82 84
Chris@82 85 For multi-dimensional complex DFTs, instead of @code{fftwnd_create_plan}
Chris@82 86 (or @code{fftw2d_create_plan} or @code{fftw3d_create_plan}), followed by
Chris@82 87 @code{fftwnd_one}, you would use @code{fftw_plan_dft} (or
Chris@82 88 @code{fftw_plan_dft_2d} or @code{fftw_plan_dft_3d}). followed by
Chris@82 89 @code{fftw_execute}. If you used @code{fftwnd} to to specify strides
Chris@82 90 etcetera, you would instead specify these via @code{fftw_plan_many_dft}.
Chris@82 91
Chris@82 92 The analogues to @code{rfftw_create_plan} and @code{rfftw_one} with
Chris@82 93 @code{FFTW_REAL_TO_COMPLEX} or @code{FFTW_COMPLEX_TO_REAL} directions
Chris@82 94 are @code{fftw_plan_r2r_1d} with kind @code{FFTW_R2HC} or
Chris@82 95 @code{FFTW_HC2R}, followed by @code{fftw_execute}. The stride etcetera
Chris@82 96 arguments of @code{rfftw} are now in @code{fftw_plan_many_r2r}.
Chris@82 97
Chris@82 98 Instead of @code{rfftwnd_create_plan} (or @code{rfftw2d_create_plan} or
Chris@82 99 @code{rfftw3d_create_plan}) followed by
Chris@82 100 @code{rfftwnd_one_real_to_complex} or
Chris@82 101 @code{rfftwnd_one_complex_to_real}, you now use @code{fftw_plan_dft_r2c}
Chris@82 102 (or @code{fftw_plan_dft_r2c_2d} or @code{fftw_plan_dft_r2c_3d}) or
Chris@82 103 @code{fftw_plan_dft_c2r} (or @code{fftw_plan_dft_c2r_2d} or
Chris@82 104 @code{fftw_plan_dft_c2r_3d}), respectively, followed by
Chris@82 105 @code{fftw_execute}. As usual, the strides etcetera of
Chris@82 106 @code{rfftwnd_real_to_complex} or @code{rfftwnd_complex_to_real} are no
Chris@82 107 specified in the advanced planner routines,
Chris@82 108 @code{fftw_plan_many_dft_r2c} or @code{fftw_plan_many_dft_c2r}.
Chris@82 109
Chris@82 110 @heading Wisdom
Chris@82 111
Chris@82 112 In FFTW 2, you had to supply the @code{FFTW_USE_WISDOM} flag in order to
Chris@82 113 use wisdom; in FFTW 3, wisdom is always used. (You could simulate the
Chris@82 114 FFTW 2 wisdom-less behavior by calling @code{fftw_forget_wisdom} after
Chris@82 115 every planner call.)
Chris@82 116
Chris@82 117 The FFTW 3 wisdom import/export routines are almost the same as before
Chris@82 118 (although the storage format is entirely different). There is one
Chris@82 119 significant difference, however. In FFTW 2, the import routines would
Chris@82 120 never read past the end of the wisdom, so you could store extra data
Chris@82 121 beyond the wisdom in the same file, for example. In FFTW 3, the
Chris@82 122 file-import routine may read up to a few hundred bytes past the end of
Chris@82 123 the wisdom, so you cannot store other data just beyond it.@footnote{We
Chris@82 124 do our own buffering because GNU libc I/O routines are horribly slow for
Chris@82 125 single-character I/O, apparently for thread-safety reasons (whether you
Chris@82 126 are using threads or not).}
Chris@82 127
Chris@82 128 Wisdom has been enhanced by additional humility in FFTW 3: whereas FFTW
Chris@82 129 2 would re-use wisdom for a given transform size regardless of the
Chris@82 130 stride etc., in FFTW 3 wisdom is only used with the strides etc. for
Chris@82 131 which it was created. Unfortunately, this means FFTW 3 has to create
Chris@82 132 new plans from scratch more often than FFTW 2 (in FFTW 2, planning
Chris@82 133 e.g. one transform of size 1024 also created wisdom for all smaller
Chris@82 134 powers of 2, but this no longer occurs).
Chris@82 135
Chris@82 136 FFTW 3 also has the new routine @code{fftw_import_system_wisdom} to
Chris@82 137 import wisdom from a standard system-wide location.
Chris@82 138
Chris@82 139 @heading Memory allocation
Chris@82 140
Chris@82 141 In FFTW 3, we recommend allocating your arrays with @code{fftw_malloc}
Chris@82 142 and deallocating them with @code{fftw_free}; this is not required, but
Chris@82 143 allows optimal performance when SIMD acceleration is used. (Those two
Chris@82 144 functions actually existed in FFTW 2, and worked the same way, but were
Chris@82 145 not documented.)
Chris@82 146
Chris@82 147 In FFTW 2, there were @code{fftw_malloc_hook} and @code{fftw_free_hook}
Chris@82 148 functions that allowed the user to replace FFTW's memory-allocation
Chris@82 149 routines (e.g. to implement different error-handling, since by default
Chris@82 150 FFTW prints an error message and calls @code{exit} to abort the program
Chris@82 151 if @code{malloc} returns @code{NULL}). These hooks are not supported in
Chris@82 152 FFTW 3; those few users who require this functionality can just
Chris@82 153 directly modify the memory-allocation routines in FFTW (they are defined
Chris@82 154 in @code{kernel/alloc.c}).
Chris@82 155
Chris@82 156 @heading Fortran interface
Chris@82 157
Chris@82 158 In FFTW 2, the subroutine names were obtained by replacing @samp{fftw_}
Chris@82 159 with @samp{fftw_f77}; in FFTW 3, you replace @samp{fftw_} with
Chris@82 160 @samp{dfftw_} (or @samp{sfftw_} or @samp{lfftw_}, depending upon the
Chris@82 161 precision).
Chris@82 162
Chris@82 163 In FFTW 3, we have begun recommending that you always declare the type
Chris@82 164 used to store plans as @code{integer*8}. (Too many people didn't notice
Chris@82 165 our instruction to switch from @code{integer} to @code{integer*8} for
Chris@82 166 64-bit machines.)
Chris@82 167
Chris@82 168 In FFTW 3, we provide a @code{fftw3.f} ``header file'' to include in
Chris@82 169 your code (and which is officially installed on Unix systems). (In FFTW
Chris@82 170 2, we supplied a @code{fftw_f77.i} file, but it was not installed.)
Chris@82 171
Chris@82 172 Otherwise, the C-Fortran interface relationship is much the same as it
Chris@82 173 was before (e.g. return values become initial parameters, and
Chris@82 174 multi-dimensional arrays are in column-major order). Unlike FFTW 2, we
Chris@82 175 do provide some support for wisdom import/export in Fortran
Chris@82 176 (@pxref{Wisdom of Fortran?}).
Chris@82 177
Chris@82 178 @heading Threads
Chris@82 179
Chris@82 180 Like FFTW 2, only the execution routines are thread-safe. All planner
Chris@82 181 routines, etcetera, should be called by only a single thread at a time
Chris@82 182 (@pxref{Thread safety}). @emph{Unlike} FFTW 2, there is no special
Chris@82 183 @code{FFTW_THREADSAFE} flag for the planner to allow a given plan to be
Chris@82 184 usable by multiple threads in parallel; this is now the case by default.
Chris@82 185
Chris@82 186 The multi-threaded version of FFTW 2 required you to pass the number of
Chris@82 187 threads each time you execute the transform. The number of threads is
Chris@82 188 now stored in the plan, and is specified before the planner is called by
Chris@82 189 @code{fftw_plan_with_nthreads}. The threads initialization routine used
Chris@82 190 to be called @code{fftw_threads_init} and would return zero on success;
Chris@82 191 the new routine is called @code{fftw_init_threads} and returns zero on
Chris@82 192 failure. @xref{Multi-threaded FFTW}.
Chris@82 193
Chris@82 194 There is no separate threads header file in FFTW 3; all the function
Chris@82 195 prototypes are in @code{<fftw3.h>}. However, you still have to link to
Chris@82 196 a separate library (@code{-lfftw3_threads -lfftw3 -lm} on Unix), as well as
Chris@82 197 to the threading library (e.g. POSIX threads on Unix).
Chris@82 198