cannam@127
|
1 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
|
cannam@127
|
2 <html>
|
cannam@127
|
3 <head><title>
|
cannam@127
|
4 FFTW FAQ - Section 3
|
cannam@127
|
5 </title>
|
cannam@127
|
6 <link rev="made" href="mailto:fftw@fftw.org">
|
cannam@127
|
7 <link rel="Contents" href="index.html">
|
cannam@127
|
8 <link rel="Start" href="index.html">
|
cannam@127
|
9 <link rel="Next" href="section4.html"><link rel="Previous" href="section2.html"><link rel="Bookmark" title="FFTW FAQ" href="index.html">
|
cannam@127
|
10 </head><body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><h1>
|
cannam@127
|
11 FFTW FAQ - Section 3 <br>
|
cannam@127
|
12 Using FFTW
|
cannam@127
|
13 </h1>
|
cannam@127
|
14
|
cannam@127
|
15 <ul>
|
cannam@127
|
16 <li><a href="#fftw2to3" rel=subdocument>Q3.1. Why not support the FFTW 2 interface in FFTW
|
cannam@127
|
17 3?</a>
|
cannam@127
|
18 <li><a href="#planperarray" rel=subdocument>Q3.2. Why do FFTW 3 plans encapsulate the input/output arrays and not just
|
cannam@127
|
19 the algorithm?</a>
|
cannam@127
|
20 <li><a href="#slow" rel=subdocument>Q3.3. FFTW seems really slow.</a>
|
cannam@127
|
21 <li><a href="#slows" rel=subdocument>Q3.4. FFTW slows down after repeated calls.</a>
|
cannam@127
|
22 <li><a href="#segfault" rel=subdocument>Q3.5. An FFTW routine is crashing when I call it.</a>
|
cannam@127
|
23 <li><a href="#fortran64" rel=subdocument>Q3.6. My Fortran program crashes when calling FFTW.</a>
|
cannam@127
|
24 <li><a href="#conventions" rel=subdocument>Q3.7. FFTW gives results different from my old
|
cannam@127
|
25 FFT.</a>
|
cannam@127
|
26 <li><a href="#nondeterministic" rel=subdocument>Q3.8. FFTW gives different results between runs</a>
|
cannam@127
|
27 <li><a href="#savePlans" rel=subdocument>Q3.9. Can I save FFTW's plans?</a>
|
cannam@127
|
28 <li><a href="#whyscaled" rel=subdocument>Q3.10. Why does your inverse transform return a scaled
|
cannam@127
|
29 result?</a>
|
cannam@127
|
30 <li><a href="#centerorigin" rel=subdocument>Q3.11. How can I make FFTW put the origin (zero frequency) at the center of
|
cannam@127
|
31 its output?</a>
|
cannam@127
|
32 <li><a href="#imageaudio" rel=subdocument>Q3.12. How do I FFT an image/audio file in <i>foobar</i> format?</a>
|
cannam@127
|
33 <li><a href="#linkfails" rel=subdocument>Q3.13. My program does not link (on Unix).</a>
|
cannam@127
|
34 <li><a href="#linkheader" rel=subdocument>Q3.14. I included your header, but linking still
|
cannam@127
|
35 fails.</a>
|
cannam@127
|
36 <li><a href="#nostack" rel=subdocument>Q3.15. My program crashes, complaining about stack
|
cannam@127
|
37 space.</a>
|
cannam@127
|
38 <li><a href="#leaks" rel=subdocument>Q3.16. FFTW seems to have a memory leak.</a>
|
cannam@127
|
39 <li><a href="#allzero" rel=subdocument>Q3.17. The output of FFTW's transform is all zeros.</a>
|
cannam@127
|
40 <li><a href="#vbetalia" rel=subdocument>Q3.18. How do I call FFTW from the Microsoft language du
|
cannam@127
|
41 jour?</a>
|
cannam@127
|
42 <li><a href="#pruned" rel=subdocument>Q3.19. Can I compute only a subset of the DFT outputs?</a>
|
cannam@127
|
43 <li><a href="#transpose" rel=subdocument>Q3.20. Can I use FFTW's routines for in-place and out-of-place matrix
|
cannam@127
|
44 transposition?</a>
|
cannam@127
|
45 </ul><hr>
|
cannam@127
|
46
|
cannam@127
|
47 <h2><A name="fftw2to3">
|
cannam@127
|
48 Question 3.1. Why not support the FFTW 2 interface in FFTW
|
cannam@127
|
49 3?
|
cannam@127
|
50 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
51
|
cannam@127
|
52 FFTW 3 has semantics incompatible with earlier versions: its plans can
|
cannam@127
|
53 only be used for a given stride, multiplicity, and other
|
cannam@127
|
54 characteristics of the input and output arrays; these stronger
|
cannam@127
|
55 semantics are necessary for performance reasons. Thus, it is
|
cannam@127
|
56 impossible to efficiently emulate the older interface (whose plans can
|
cannam@127
|
57 be used for any transform of the same size). We believe that it
|
cannam@127
|
58 should be possible to upgrade most programs without any difficulty,
|
cannam@127
|
59 however.
|
cannam@127
|
60 <h2><A name="planperarray">
|
cannam@127
|
61 Question 3.2. Why do FFTW 3 plans encapsulate the input/output arrays
|
cannam@127
|
62 and not just the algorithm?
|
cannam@127
|
63 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
64
|
cannam@127
|
65 There are several reasons:
|
cannam@127
|
66 <ul>
|
cannam@127
|
67 <li>It was important for performance reasons that the plan be specific to
|
cannam@127
|
68 array characteristics like the stride (and alignment, for SIMD), and
|
cannam@127
|
69 requiring that the user maintain these invariants is error prone.
|
cannam@127
|
70
|
cannam@127
|
71 <li>In most high-performance applications, as far as we can tell, you are
|
cannam@127
|
72 usually transforming the same array over and over, so FFTW's semantics
|
cannam@127
|
73 should not be a burden.
|
cannam@127
|
74 <li>If you need to transform another array of the same size, creating a
|
cannam@127
|
75 new plan once the first exists is a cheap operation.
|
cannam@127
|
76
|
cannam@127
|
77 <li>If you need to transform many arrays of the same size at once, you
|
cannam@127
|
78 should really use the <code>plan_many</code> routines in FFTW's "advanced"
|
cannam@127
|
79 interface.
|
cannam@127
|
80 <li>If the abovementioned array characteristics are the same, you are
|
cannam@127
|
81 willing to pay close attention to the documentation, and you really
|
cannam@127
|
82 need to, we provide a "new-array execution" interface to
|
cannam@127
|
83 apply a plan to a new array.
|
cannam@127
|
84 </ul>
|
cannam@127
|
85
|
cannam@127
|
86 <h2><A name="slow">
|
cannam@127
|
87 Question 3.3. FFTW seems really slow.
|
cannam@127
|
88 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
89
|
cannam@127
|
90 You are probably recreating the plan before every transform, rather
|
cannam@127
|
91 than creating it once and reusing it for all transforms of the same
|
cannam@127
|
92 size. FFTW is designed to be used in the following way:
|
cannam@127
|
93
|
cannam@127
|
94 <ul>
|
cannam@127
|
95 <li>First, you create a plan. This will take several seconds.
|
cannam@127
|
96
|
cannam@127
|
97 <li>Then, you reuse the plan many times to perform FFTs. These are fast.
|
cannam@127
|
98
|
cannam@127
|
99 </ul>
|
cannam@127
|
100 If you don't need to compute many transforms and the time for the
|
cannam@127
|
101 planner is significant, you have two options. First, you can use the
|
cannam@127
|
102 <code>FFTW_ESTIMATE</code> option in the planner, which uses heuristics
|
cannam@127
|
103 instead of runtime measurements and produces a good plan in a short
|
cannam@127
|
104 time. Second, you can use the wisdom feature to precompute the plan;
|
cannam@127
|
105 see <A href="#savePlans">Q3.9 `Can I save FFTW's plans?'</A>
|
cannam@127
|
106 <h2><A name="slows">
|
cannam@127
|
107 Question 3.4. FFTW slows down after repeated
|
cannam@127
|
108 calls.
|
cannam@127
|
109 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
110
|
cannam@127
|
111 Probably, NaNs or similar are creeping into your data, and the
|
cannam@127
|
112 slowdown is due to the resulting floating-point exceptions. For
|
cannam@127
|
113 example, be aware that repeatedly FFTing the same array is a diverging
|
cannam@127
|
114 process (because FFTW computes the unnormalized transform).
|
cannam@127
|
115
|
cannam@127
|
116 <h2><A name="segfault">
|
cannam@127
|
117 Question 3.5. An FFTW routine is crashing when I call
|
cannam@127
|
118 it.
|
cannam@127
|
119 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
120
|
cannam@127
|
121 Did the FFTW test programs pass (<code>make check</code>, or <code>cd tests; make bigcheck</code> if you want to be paranoid)? If so, you almost
|
cannam@127
|
122 certainly have a bug in your own code. For example, you could be
|
cannam@127
|
123 passing invalid arguments (such as wrongly-sized arrays) to FFTW, or
|
cannam@127
|
124 you could simply have memory corruption elsewhere in your program that
|
cannam@127
|
125 causes random crashes later on. Please don't complain to us unless
|
cannam@127
|
126 you can come up with a minimal self-contained program (preferably
|
cannam@127
|
127 under 30 lines) that illustrates the problem.
|
cannam@127
|
128
|
cannam@127
|
129 <h2><A name="fortran64">
|
cannam@127
|
130 Question 3.6. My Fortran program crashes when calling
|
cannam@127
|
131 FFTW.
|
cannam@127
|
132 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
133
|
cannam@127
|
134 As described in the manual, on 64-bit machines you must store the
|
cannam@127
|
135 plans in variables large enough to hold a pointer, for example
|
cannam@127
|
136 <code>integer*8</code>. We recommend using <code>integer*8</code> on 32-bit machines as well, to simplify porting.
|
cannam@127
|
137
|
cannam@127
|
138 <h2><A name="conventions">
|
cannam@127
|
139 Question 3.7. FFTW gives results different from my old
|
cannam@127
|
140 FFT.
|
cannam@127
|
141 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
142
|
cannam@127
|
143 People follow many different conventions for the DFT, and you should
|
cannam@127
|
144 be sure to know the ones that we use (described in the FFTW manual).
|
cannam@127
|
145 In particular, you should be aware that the
|
cannam@127
|
146 <code>FFTW_FORWARD</code>/<code>FFTW_BACKWARD</code> directions correspond to signs of -1/+1 in the exponent of the DFT definition.
|
cannam@127
|
147 (<i>Numerical Recipes</i> uses the opposite convention.)
|
cannam@127
|
148 <p>
|
cannam@127
|
149 You should also know that we compute an unnormalized transform. In
|
cannam@127
|
150 contrast, Matlab is an example of program that computes a normalized
|
cannam@127
|
151 transform. See <A href="#whyscaled">Q3.10 `Why does your inverse transform return a scaled
|
cannam@127
|
152 result?'</A>.
|
cannam@127
|
153 <p>
|
cannam@127
|
154 Finally, note that floating-point arithmetic is not exact, so
|
cannam@127
|
155 different FFT algorithms will give slightly different results (on the
|
cannam@127
|
156 order of the numerical accuracy; typically a fractional difference of
|
cannam@127
|
157 1e-15 or so in double precision).
|
cannam@127
|
158 <h2><A name="nondeterministic">
|
cannam@127
|
159 Question 3.8. FFTW gives different results between
|
cannam@127
|
160 runs
|
cannam@127
|
161 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
162
|
cannam@127
|
163 If you use <code>FFTW_MEASURE</code> or <code>FFTW_PATIENT</code> mode, then the algorithm FFTW employs is not deterministic: it depends on
|
cannam@127
|
164 runtime performance measurements. This will cause the results to vary
|
cannam@127
|
165 slightly from run to run. However, the differences should be slight,
|
cannam@127
|
166 on the order of the floating-point precision, and therefore should
|
cannam@127
|
167 have no practical impact on most applications.
|
cannam@127
|
168
|
cannam@127
|
169 <p>
|
cannam@127
|
170 If you use saved plans (wisdom) or <code>FFTW_ESTIMATE</code> mode, however, then the algorithm is deterministic and the results should be
|
cannam@127
|
171 identical between runs.
|
cannam@127
|
172 <h2><A name="savePlans">
|
cannam@127
|
173 Question 3.9. Can I save FFTW's plans?
|
cannam@127
|
174 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
175
|
cannam@127
|
176 Yes. Starting with version 1.2, FFTW provides the
|
cannam@127
|
177 <code>wisdom</code> mechanism for saving plans; see the FFTW manual.
|
cannam@127
|
178
|
cannam@127
|
179 <h2><A name="whyscaled">
|
cannam@127
|
180 Question 3.10. Why does your inverse transform return a scaled
|
cannam@127
|
181 result?
|
cannam@127
|
182 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
183
|
cannam@127
|
184 Computing the forward transform followed by the backward transform (or
|
cannam@127
|
185 vice versa) yields the original array scaled by the size of the array.
|
cannam@127
|
186 (For multi-dimensional transforms, the size of the array is the
|
cannam@127
|
187 product of the dimensions.) We could, instead, have chosen a
|
cannam@127
|
188 normalization that would have returned the unscaled array. Or, to
|
cannam@127
|
189 accomodate the many conventions in this matter, the transform routines
|
cannam@127
|
190 could have accepted a "scale factor" parameter. We did not
|
cannam@127
|
191 do this, however, for two reasons. First, we didn't want to sacrifice
|
cannam@127
|
192 performance in the common case where the scale factor is 1. Second, in
|
cannam@127
|
193 real applications the FFT is followed or preceded by some computation
|
cannam@127
|
194 on the data, into which the scale factor can typically be absorbed at
|
cannam@127
|
195 little or no cost.
|
cannam@127
|
196 <h2><A name="centerorigin">
|
cannam@127
|
197 Question 3.11. How can I make FFTW put the origin (zero frequency) at
|
cannam@127
|
198 the center of its output?
|
cannam@127
|
199 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
200
|
cannam@127
|
201 For human viewing of a spectrum, it is often convenient to put the
|
cannam@127
|
202 origin in frequency space at the center of the output array, rather
|
cannam@127
|
203 than in the zero-th element (the default in FFTW). If all of the
|
cannam@127
|
204 dimensions of your array are even, you can accomplish this by simply
|
cannam@127
|
205 multiplying each element of the input array by (-1)^(i + j + ...),
|
cannam@127
|
206 where i, j, etcetera are the indices of the element. (This trick is a
|
cannam@127
|
207 general property of the DFT, and is not specific to FFTW.)
|
cannam@127
|
208
|
cannam@127
|
209 <h2><A name="imageaudio">
|
cannam@127
|
210 Question 3.12. How do I FFT an image/audio file in
|
cannam@127
|
211 <i>foobar</i> format?
|
cannam@127
|
212 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
213
|
cannam@127
|
214 FFTW performs an FFT on an array of floating-point values. You can
|
cannam@127
|
215 certainly use it to compute the transform of an image or audio stream,
|
cannam@127
|
216 but you are responsible for figuring out your data format and
|
cannam@127
|
217 converting it to the form FFTW requires.
|
cannam@127
|
218
|
cannam@127
|
219 <h2><A name="linkfails">
|
cannam@127
|
220 Question 3.13. My program does not link (on
|
cannam@127
|
221 Unix).
|
cannam@127
|
222 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
223
|
cannam@127
|
224 The libraries must be listed in the correct order
|
cannam@127
|
225 (<code>-lfftw3 -lm</code> for FFTW 3.x) and <i>after</i> your program sources/objects. (The general rule is that if <i>A</i> uses <i>B</i>, then <i>A</i> must be listed before <i>B</i> in the link command.).
|
cannam@127
|
226 <h2><A name="linkheader">
|
cannam@127
|
227 Question 3.14. I included your header, but linking still
|
cannam@127
|
228 fails.
|
cannam@127
|
229 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
230
|
cannam@127
|
231 You're a C++ programmer, aren't you? You have to compile the FFTW
|
cannam@127
|
232 library and link it into your program, not just
|
cannam@127
|
233 <code>#include <fftw3.h></code>. (Yes, this is really a FAQ.)
|
cannam@127
|
234 <h2><A name="nostack">
|
cannam@127
|
235 Question 3.15. My program crashes, complaining about stack
|
cannam@127
|
236 space.
|
cannam@127
|
237 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
238
|
cannam@127
|
239 You cannot declare large arrays with automatic storage (e.g. via
|
cannam@127
|
240 <code>fftw_complex array[N]</code>); you should use <code>fftw_malloc</code> (or equivalent) to allocate the arrays you want
|
cannam@127
|
241 to transform if they are larger than a few hundred elements.
|
cannam@127
|
242
|
cannam@127
|
243 <h2><A name="leaks">
|
cannam@127
|
244 Question 3.16. FFTW seems to have a memory
|
cannam@127
|
245 leak.
|
cannam@127
|
246 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
247
|
cannam@127
|
248 After you create a plan, FFTW caches the information required to
|
cannam@127
|
249 quickly recreate the plan. (See <A href="#savePlans">Q3.9 `Can I save FFTW's plans?'</A>) It also maintains a small amount of other persistent memory. You can deallocate all of
|
cannam@127
|
250 FFTW's internally allocated memory, if you wish, by calling
|
cannam@127
|
251 <code>fftw_cleanup()</code>, as documented in the manual.
|
cannam@127
|
252 <h2><A name="allzero">
|
cannam@127
|
253 Question 3.17. The output of FFTW's transform is all
|
cannam@127
|
254 zeros.
|
cannam@127
|
255 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
256
|
cannam@127
|
257 You should initialize your input array <i>after</i> creating the plan, unless you use <code>FFTW_ESTIMATE</code>: planning with <code>FFTW_MEASURE</code> or <code>FFTW_PATIENT</code> overwrites the input/output arrays, as described in the manual.
|
cannam@127
|
258
|
cannam@127
|
259 <h2><A name="vbetalia">
|
cannam@127
|
260 Question 3.18. How do I call FFTW from the Microsoft language du
|
cannam@127
|
261 jour?
|
cannam@127
|
262 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
263
|
cannam@127
|
264 Please <i>do not</i> ask us Windows-specific questions. We do not
|
cannam@127
|
265 use Windows. We know nothing about Visual Basic, Visual C++, or .NET.
|
cannam@127
|
266 Please find the appropriate Usenet discussion group and ask your
|
cannam@127
|
267 question there. See also <A href="section2.html#runOnWindows">Q2.2 `Does FFTW run on Windows?'</A>.
|
cannam@127
|
268 <h2><A name="pruned">
|
cannam@127
|
269 Question 3.19. Can I compute only a subset of the DFT
|
cannam@127
|
270 outputs?
|
cannam@127
|
271 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
272
|
cannam@127
|
273 In general, no, an FFT intrinsically computes all outputs from all
|
cannam@127
|
274 inputs. In principle, there is something called a
|
cannam@127
|
275 <i>pruned FFT</i> that can do what you want, but to compute K outputs out of N the
|
cannam@127
|
276 complexity is in general O(N log K) instead of O(N log N), thus saving
|
cannam@127
|
277 only a small additive factor in the log. (The same argument holds if
|
cannam@127
|
278 you instead have only K nonzero inputs.)
|
cannam@127
|
279
|
cannam@127
|
280 <p>
|
cannam@127
|
281 There are some specific cases in which you can get the O(N log K)
|
cannam@127
|
282 performance benefits easily, however, by combining a few ordinary
|
cannam@127
|
283 FFTs. In particular, the case where you want the first K outputs,
|
cannam@127
|
284 where K divides N, can be handled by performing N/K transforms of size
|
cannam@127
|
285 K and then summing the outputs multiplied by appropriate phase
|
cannam@127
|
286 factors. For more details, see <A href="http://www.fftw.org/pruned.html">pruned FFTs with FFTW</A>.
|
cannam@127
|
287 <p>
|
cannam@127
|
288 There are also some algorithms that compute pruned transforms
|
cannam@127
|
289 <i>approximately</i>, but they are beyond the scope of this FAQ.
|
cannam@127
|
290
|
cannam@127
|
291 <h2><A name="transpose">
|
cannam@127
|
292 Question 3.20. Can I use FFTW's routines for in-place and
|
cannam@127
|
293 out-of-place matrix transposition?
|
cannam@127
|
294 </A></h2>
|
cannam@127
|
295
|
cannam@127
|
296 You can use the FFTW guru interface to create a rank-0 transform of
|
cannam@127
|
297 vector rank 2 where the vector strides are transposed. (A rank-0
|
cannam@127
|
298 transform is equivalent to a 1D transform of size 1, which. just
|
cannam@127
|
299 copies the input into the output.) Specifying the same location for
|
cannam@127
|
300 the input and output makes the transpose in-place.
|
cannam@127
|
301
|
cannam@127
|
302 <p>
|
cannam@127
|
303 For double-valued data stored in row-major format, plan creation looks
|
cannam@127
|
304 like this: <pre>
|
cannam@127
|
305 fftw_plan plan_transpose(int rows, int cols, double *in, double *out)
|
cannam@127
|
306 {
|
cannam@127
|
307 const unsigned flags = FFTW_ESTIMATE; /* other flags are possible */
|
cannam@127
|
308 fftw_iodim howmany_dims[2];
|
cannam@127
|
309
|
cannam@127
|
310 howmany_dims[0].n = rows;
|
cannam@127
|
311 howmany_dims[0].is = cols;
|
cannam@127
|
312 howmany_dims[0].os = 1;
|
cannam@127
|
313
|
cannam@127
|
314 howmany_dims[1].n = cols;
|
cannam@127
|
315 howmany_dims[1].is = 1;
|
cannam@127
|
316 howmany_dims[1].os = rows;
|
cannam@127
|
317
|
cannam@127
|
318 return fftw_plan_guru_r2r(/*rank=*/ 0, /*dims=*/ NULL,
|
cannam@127
|
319 /*howmany_rank=*/ 2, howmany_dims,
|
cannam@127
|
320 in, out, /*kind=*/ NULL, flags);
|
cannam@127
|
321 }
|
cannam@127
|
322 </pre>
|
cannam@127
|
323 (This entry was written by Rhys Ulerich.)
|
cannam@127
|
324 <hr>
|
cannam@127
|
325 Next: <a href="section4.html" rel=precedes>Internals of FFTW</a>.<br>
|
cannam@127
|
326 Back: <a href="section2.html" rev=precedes>Installing FFTW</a>.<br>
|
cannam@127
|
327 <a href="index.html" rev=subdocument>Return to contents</a>.<p>
|
cannam@127
|
328 <address>
|
cannam@127
|
329 <A href="http://www.fftw.org">Matteo Frigo and Steven G. Johnson</A> / <A href="mailto:fftw@fftw.org">fftw@fftw.org</A>
|
cannam@127
|
330 - 30 July 2016
|
cannam@127
|
331 </address><br>
|
cannam@127
|
332 Extracted from FFTW Frequently Asked Questions with Answers,
|
cannam@127
|
333 Copyright © 2016 Matteo Frigo and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
|
cannam@127
|
334 </body></html>
|