changeset 13:bba6c067444c

removed the survey appendix from the paper.

--- a/cannam.tex	Thu Sep 22 14:49:09 2011 +0100
+++ b/cannam.tex	Thu Sep 22 16:24:37 2011 +0100
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 \documentclass{article}
 \usepackage{spconf,amsmath,graphicx}
+\def\CC{{C\nolinebreak[4]\hspace{-.05em}\raisebox{.4ex}{\tiny\bf ++}}}
+
 
 \title{The title of the scientific paper: A long, explanatory subtitle}
 
@@ -108,9 +110,23 @@
 
 Although the Reproducible Research principle provides a comprehensive
 solution to the problem of code dissemination, in practice take-up in
-this field appears limited.  In our survey of UK audio and music
-researchers (see section \ref{sec:survey}), the majority of
-respondents said either that they took no steps to ensure
+this field appears limited.  
+
+In order to better understand the reality  faced by the audio and
+music research community, we conducted a survey on software usage and
+development~\cite{ssamrsurvey}. 
+In October 2010 we opened an online survey, advertised to a
+number of senior researchers in other groups around the UK. This
+survey asked for detailed information about the software usage and authorship practices of
+researchers, with the aim of obtaining a number of individual case
+points for further examination as well as some broad numerical
+results. The survey, started in November 2010, closed in April 2011,
+with 54 complete and 23 partially complete responses. There were
+responses from at least 16 different institutions.
+
+
+There was also a section on Reproducible Research. In this section the
+majority of respondents said either that they took no steps to ensure
 reproducibility or that they only made code or data available on
 request.  Obstacles cited included lack of time, copyright
 restrictions, and the potential for commercial use of the code
@@ -149,7 +165,7 @@
 used, software developed in earlier research is not always readily
 available to later researchers.  For example, in the well-known
 subject of beat tracking, the method of Scheirer et al \cite{scheirer}
-was developed in C++ for a legacy platform and is now only available
+was developed in \CC for a legacy platform and is now only available
 informally; Goto et al \cite{goto} was written for a now-defunct
 parallel architecture and never publicly released; Hainsworth
 \cite{hainsworth} was written in MATLAB with a non-portable DLL
@@ -298,10 +314,10 @@
 % something about MATLAB?
 
 
-\subsection{Case studies}
+\section{Case studies}
 \label{sec:casestudies}
 
-\subsubsection{Beat Trackers}
+\subsection{Beat Trackers}
 
 In section \ref{subsec:researchsoft} we gave example of beat tracking
 methods whose implementations had effectively been lost.  However, we
@@ -318,7 +334,7 @@
 the SoundSoftware code repository described in section \ref{sec:codesite}.
 
 
-\subsubsection{Chordino and NNLS Chroma}
+\subsection{Chordino and NNLS Chroma}
 \label{subsubsec:chordino}
 
 % Note that in this case the author did _not_ follow a RR methodology, and the code is not referred to in the paper.  The link between code and publication must be made after the fact.
@@ -345,15 +361,15 @@
 reusability have been achieved even though the process did not begin
 until after the initial publication.
 
-\subsubsection{Auditory Image Models}
+\subsection{Auditory Image Models}
 \label{subsubsec:aim}
 
 \section{Future work}
 \label{sec:future}
 
-\section{Appendix: SoundSoftware survey 2010}
-\label{sec:survey}
-\input{survey_appendix}
+%%\section{Appendix: SoundSoftware survey 2010}
+%%\label{sec:survey}
+%%\input{survey_appendix}
 
 % Below is an example of how to insert images. Delete the ``\vspace'' line,
 % uncomment the preceding line ``\centerline...'' and replace ``imageX.ps''

--- a/refs.bib	Thu Sep 22 14:49:09 2011 +0100
+++ b/refs.bib	Thu Sep 22 16:24:37 2011 +0100
@@ -114,3 +114,4 @@
  address = {Washington, DC, USA},
 } 
 
+

--- a/survey_appendix.tex	Thu Sep 22 14:49:09 2011 +0100
+++ b/survey_appendix.tex	Thu Sep 22 16:24:37 2011 +0100
@@ -1,11 +1,3 @@
-In October 2010 we opened an online survey, advertised to a
-number of senior researchers in other groups around the UK. This
-survey asked for detailed information about the software usage and authorship practices of
-researchers, with the aim of obtaining a number of individual case
-points for further examination as well as some broad numerical
-results. The survey, started in November 2010, closed in April 2011,
-with 54 complete and 23 partially complete responses. There were
-responses from at least 16 different institutions.
 
 
 \subsection{Software Development}