Feature #1681
digitalWriteFrame and digitalWriteFrameOnce
| Status: | Closed | Start date: | 2016-04-20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | - | % Done: | 0% | |
| Category: | - | |||
| Target version: | - |
Description
The difference between the two is not obvious from the docs, neither it is always clear from the example code.
As a result, people tend to use digitalWriteFrame() on a sample-by-sample basis, causing high CPU load.
I would suggest renaming digitalWriteFrameOnce to digitalWriteFrame (to make it equivalent to analogWriteFrame/audioWriteFrame), and renaming the current digitalWriteFrame to digitalWriteFramePersist
Updated by