comparison docs/Instructions/Instructions.tex @ 2273:ad2e070c92e5

Weird merge error fix

 	\subsection{Examples}
 		Below are a number of established interface types, which are all supported using the templates from the previous section. % Confirm?
 		From \cite{waetwac}. 
 
 		% TODO: add labels like (\textbf{\texttt{horizontal-sliders}}) to show which type of interface can be created using which template
-
+		
 		\begin{itemize}
 			\item AB Test / Pairwise comparison~\cite{lipshitz1981great,david1963method}: Two stimuli presented simultaneously, participant selects a preferred stimulus.
 			\item ABC/HR (ITU-R BS. 1116)~\cite{recommendation19971116} (Mean Opinion Score: MOS): each stimulus has a continuous scale (5-1), labeled as Imperceptible, Perceptible but not annoying, Slightly annoying, Annoying, Very annoying.
 			\item -50 to 50 Bipolar with Ref: each stimulus has a continuous scale -50 to 50 with default values as 0 in middle and a reference.
 			\item Absolute Category Rating (ACR) Scale~\cite{rec1996p}: Likert but labels are Bad, Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent 
 			\item ABX Test~\cite{clark1982high}: Two stimuli are presented along with a reference and the participant has to select a preferred stimulus, often the closest to the reference.
-			\item APE \cite{ape}: Multiple stimuli on one or more axes for inter-sample rating.
+			\item APE~\cite{ape}: Multiple stimuli on one or more axes for inter-sample rating.
 			%\item APE style 2D \cite{ape}: Multiple stimuli on a 2D plane for inter-sample rating (e.g. Valence Arousal). % TO BE IMPLEMENTED 
 			\item Comparison Category Rating (CCR) Scale~\cite{rec1996p}: ACR \& DCR but 7 point scale, with reference: Much better, Better, Slightly better, About the same, Slightly worse, Worse, Much worse.
 			\item Degredation Category Rating (DCR) Scale~\cite{rec1996p}: ABC \& Likert but labels are (5) Inaudible, (4) Audible but not annoying, (3) Slightly annoying, (2) Annoying, (1) Very annoying.
 			\item ITU-R 5 Point Continuous Impairment Scale~\cite{rec1997bs}: Same as ABC/HR but with a reference.
 			\item Likert scale~\cite{likert1932technique}: each stimulus has a five point scale with values: Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree and Strongly disagree.
 			\item MUSHRA (ITU-R BS. 1534)~\cite{recommendation20031534}  Multiple stimuli are presented and rated on a continuous scale, which includes a reference, hidden reference and hidden anchors.
 			\item Pairwise Comparison (Better/Worse)~\cite{david1963method}: every stimulus is rated as being either better or worse than the reference.
 			\item Rank Scale~\cite{pascoe1983evaluation}: stimuli ranked on single horizontal scale, where they are ordered in preference order.
 			\item 9 Point Hedonic Category Rating Scale~\cite{peryam1952advanced}: each stimulus has a seven point scale with values: Like extremely, Like very much, Like moderate, Like slightly, Neither like nor dislike, Dislike extremely, Dislike very much, Dislike moderate, Dislike slightly. There is also a provided reference.
 		\end{itemize}
+
 
 	\subsection{Building your own interface}
 
 		\subsubsection{Nodes to familiarise}
 			Core.js handles several very important nodes which you should become familiar with. The first is the Audio Engine, initialised and stored in variable `AudioEngineContext'. This handles the playback of the web audio nodes as well as storing the `AudioObjects'. The `AudioObjects' are custom nodes which hold the audio fragments for playback. These nodes also have a link to two interface objects, the comment box if enabled and the interface providing the ranking. On creation of an `AudioObject' the interface link will be nulled, it is up to the interface to link these correctly.