Mercurial > hg > vamp-build-and-test
diff DEPENDENCIES/generic/include/boost/range/concepts.hpp @ 101:c530137014c0
Update Boost headers (1.58.0)
author | Chris Cannam |
---|---|
date | Mon, 07 Sep 2015 11:12:49 +0100 |
parents | 2665513ce2d3 |
children |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/DEPENDENCIES/generic/include/boost/range/concepts.hpp Fri Sep 04 12:01:02 2015 +0100 +++ b/DEPENDENCIES/generic/include/boost/range/concepts.hpp Mon Sep 07 11:12:49 2015 +0100 @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ #include <boost/range/iterator.hpp> #include <boost/range/value_type.hpp> #include <boost/range/detail/misc_concept.hpp> +#include <boost/type_traits/remove_reference.hpp> /*! * \file @@ -63,6 +64,7 @@ #ifndef BOOST_RANGE_ENABLE_CONCEPT_ASSERT // List broken compiler versions here: +#ifndef __clang__ #ifdef __GNUC__ // GNUC 4.2 has strange issues correctly detecting compliance with the Concepts // hence the least disruptive approach is to turn-off the concept checking for @@ -72,6 +74,14 @@ #endif #endif + #ifdef __GCCXML__ + // GCC XML, unsurprisingly, has the same issues + #if __GCCXML_GNUC__ == 4 && __GCCXML_GNUC_MINOR__ == 2 + #define BOOST_RANGE_ENABLE_CONCEPT_ASSERT 0 + #endif + #endif +#endif + #ifdef __BORLANDC__ #define BOOST_RANGE_ENABLE_CONCEPT_ASSERT 0 #endif @@ -253,41 +263,51 @@ struct SinglePassRangeConcept { #if BOOST_RANGE_ENABLE_CONCEPT_ASSERT - typedef BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME range_iterator<T const>::type const_iterator; - typedef BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME range_iterator<T>::type iterator; + // A few compilers don't like the rvalue reference T types so just + // remove it. + typedef BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME remove_reference<T>::type Rng; - BOOST_RANGE_CONCEPT_ASSERT((range_detail::SinglePassIteratorConcept<iterator>)); - BOOST_RANGE_CONCEPT_ASSERT((range_detail::SinglePassIteratorConcept<const_iterator>)); + typedef BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME range_iterator< + Rng const + >::type const_iterator; - BOOST_CONCEPT_USAGE(SinglePassRangeConcept) - { + typedef BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME range_iterator<Rng>::type iterator; + + BOOST_RANGE_CONCEPT_ASSERT(( + range_detail::SinglePassIteratorConcept<iterator>)); + + BOOST_RANGE_CONCEPT_ASSERT(( + range_detail::SinglePassIteratorConcept<const_iterator>)); + + BOOST_CONCEPT_USAGE(SinglePassRangeConcept) + { // This has been modified from assigning to this->i // (where i was a member variable) to improve // compatibility with Boost.Lambda iterator i1 = boost::begin(*m_range); iterator i2 = boost::end(*m_range); - ignore_unused_variable_warning(i1); - ignore_unused_variable_warning(i2); + boost::ignore_unused_variable_warning(i1); + boost::ignore_unused_variable_warning(i2); const_constraints(*m_range); } private: - void const_constraints(const T& const_range) + void const_constraints(const Rng& const_range) { const_iterator ci1 = boost::begin(const_range); const_iterator ci2 = boost::end(const_range); - ignore_unused_variable_warning(ci1); - ignore_unused_variable_warning(ci2); + boost::ignore_unused_variable_warning(ci1); + boost::ignore_unused_variable_warning(ci2); } // Rationale: // The type of m_range is T* rather than T because it allows // T to be an abstract class. The other obvious alternative of // T& produces a warning on some compilers. - T* m_range; + Rng* m_range; #endif }; @@ -301,11 +321,11 @@ #endif }; - template<class Range> + template<class T> struct WriteableRangeConcept { #if BOOST_RANGE_ENABLE_CONCEPT_ASSERT - typedef BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME range_iterator<Range>::type iterator; + typedef BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME range_iterator<T>::type iterator; BOOST_CONCEPT_USAGE(WriteableRangeConcept) { @@ -313,7 +333,7 @@ } private: iterator i; - BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME range_value<Range>::type v; + BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME range_value<T>::type v; #endif };