| Thu, 04 May 2017 13:32:42 +0100 |
Chris Cannam |
We don't need to return the tick instruction gubbins
scale-ticks
|
| Thu, 04 May 2017 13:19:57 +0100 |
Chris Cannam |
Another test, that needs some more work
scale-ticks
|
| Thu, 04 May 2017 10:46:38 +0100 |
Chris Cannam |
After seeing them in action, I changed my mind about the wisdom of these trailing .0s
scale-ticks
|
| Thu, 04 May 2017 10:14:56 +0100 |
Chris Cannam |
Add logarithmic ticks. This is getting complicated!
scale-ticks
|
| Thu, 04 May 2017 08:53:00 +0100 |
Chris Cannam |
Tests now passing
scale-ticks
|
| Thu, 04 May 2017 08:32:41 +0100 |
Chris Cannam |
Change loop to something that feels more correct, though it makes no difference to the tests here. More tests, one failing.
scale-ticks
|
| Wed, 03 May 2017 18:26:26 +0100 |
Chris Cannam |
More tests & fixes
scale-ticks
|
| Wed, 03 May 2017 18:06:48 +0100 |
Chris Cannam |
These tests now pass (in some cases by fixing the tests)
scale-ticks
|
| Wed, 03 May 2017 18:01:25 +0100 |
Chris Cannam |
More fixes, more tests, including some more that now fail
scale-ticks
|
| Wed, 03 May 2017 17:02:01 +0100 |
Chris Cannam |
These tests now pass, but there's still a lot to be done
scale-ticks
|
| Wed, 03 May 2017 13:02:08 +0100 |
Chris Cannam |
Scale tick labeller, and tests (some failing so far)
scale-ticks
|
