cannam@95: @node Upgrading from FFTW version 2, Installation and Customization, Calling FFTW from Legacy Fortran, Top cannam@95: @chapter Upgrading from FFTW version 2 cannam@95: cannam@95: In this chapter, we outline the process for updating codes designed for cannam@95: the older FFTW 2 interface to work with FFTW 3. The interface for FFTW cannam@95: 3 is not backwards-compatible with the interface for FFTW 2 and earlier cannam@95: versions; codes written to use those versions will fail to link with cannam@95: FFTW 3. Nor is it possible to write ``compatibility wrappers'' to cannam@95: bridge the gap (at least not efficiently), because FFTW 3 has different cannam@95: semantics from previous versions. However, upgrading should be a cannam@95: straightforward process because the data formats are identical and the cannam@95: overall style of planning/execution is essentially the same. cannam@95: cannam@95: Unlike FFTW 2, there are no separate header files for real and complex cannam@95: transforms (or even for different precisions) in FFTW 3; all interfaces cannam@95: are defined in the @code{} header file. cannam@95: cannam@95: @heading Numeric Types cannam@95: cannam@95: The main difference in data types is that @code{fftw_complex} in FFTW 2 cannam@95: was defined as a @code{struct} with macros @code{c_re} and @code{c_im} cannam@95: for accessing the real/imaginary parts. (This is binary-compatible with cannam@95: FFTW 3 on any machine except perhaps for some older Crays in single cannam@95: precision.) The equivalent macros for FFTW 3 are: cannam@95: cannam@95: @example cannam@95: #define c_re(c) ((c)[0]) cannam@95: #define c_im(c) ((c)[1]) cannam@95: @end example cannam@95: cannam@95: This does not work if you are using the C99 complex type, however, cannam@95: unless you insert a @code{double*} typecast into the above macros cannam@95: (@pxref{Complex numbers}). cannam@95: cannam@95: Also, FFTW 2 had an @code{fftw_real} typedef that was an alias for cannam@95: @code{double} (in double precision). In FFTW 3 you should just use cannam@95: @code{double} (or whatever precision you are employing). cannam@95: cannam@95: @heading Plans cannam@95: cannam@95: The major difference between FFTW 2 and FFTW 3 is in the cannam@95: planning/execution division of labor. In FFTW 2, plans were found for a cannam@95: given transform size and type, and then could be applied to @emph{any} cannam@95: arrays and for @emph{any} multiplicity/stride parameters. In FFTW 3, cannam@95: you specify the particular arrays, stride parameters, etcetera when cannam@95: creating the plan, and the plan is then executed for @emph{those} arrays cannam@95: (unless the guru interface is used) and @emph{those} parameters cannam@95: @emph{only}. (FFTW 2 had ``specific planner'' routines that planned for cannam@95: a particular array and stride, but the plan could still be used for cannam@95: other arrays and strides.) That is, much of the information that was cannam@95: formerly specified at execution time is now specified at planning time. cannam@95: cannam@95: Like FFTW 2's specific planner routines, the FFTW 3 planner overwrites cannam@95: the input/output arrays unless you use @code{FFTW_ESTIMATE}. cannam@95: cannam@95: FFTW 2 had separate data types @code{fftw_plan}, @code{fftwnd_plan}, cannam@95: @code{rfftw_plan}, and @code{rfftwnd_plan} for complex and real one- and cannam@95: multi-dimensional transforms, and each type had its own @samp{destroy} cannam@95: function. In FFTW 3, all plans are of type @code{fftw_plan} and all are cannam@95: destroyed by @code{fftw_destroy_plan(plan)}. cannam@95: cannam@95: Where you formerly used @code{fftw_create_plan} and @code{fftw_one} to cannam@95: plan and compute a single 1d transform, you would now use cannam@95: @code{fftw_plan_dft_1d} to plan the transform. If you used the generic cannam@95: @code{fftw} function to execute the transform with multiplicity cannam@95: (@code{howmany}) and stride parameters, you would now use the advanced cannam@95: interface @code{fftw_plan_many_dft} to specify those parameters. The cannam@95: plans are now executed with @code{fftw_execute(plan)}, which takes all cannam@95: of its parameters (including the input/output arrays) from the plan. cannam@95: cannam@95: In-place transforms no longer interpret their output argument as scratch cannam@95: space, nor is there an @code{FFTW_IN_PLACE} flag. You simply pass the cannam@95: same pointer for both the input and output arguments. (Previously, the cannam@95: output @code{ostride} and @code{odist} parameters were ignored for cannam@95: in-place transforms; now, if they are specified via the advanced cannam@95: interface, they are significant even in the in-place case, although they cannam@95: should normally equal the corresponding input parameters.) cannam@95: cannam@95: The @code{FFTW_ESTIMATE} and @code{FFTW_MEASURE} flags have the same cannam@95: meaning as before, although the planning time will differ. You may also cannam@95: consider using @code{FFTW_PATIENT}, which is like @code{FFTW_MEASURE} cannam@95: except that it takes more time in order to consider a wider variety of cannam@95: algorithms. cannam@95: cannam@95: For multi-dimensional complex DFTs, instead of @code{fftwnd_create_plan} cannam@95: (or @code{fftw2d_create_plan} or @code{fftw3d_create_plan}), followed by cannam@95: @code{fftwnd_one}, you would use @code{fftw_plan_dft} (or cannam@95: @code{fftw_plan_dft_2d} or @code{fftw_plan_dft_3d}). followed by cannam@95: @code{fftw_execute}. If you used @code{fftwnd} to to specify strides cannam@95: etcetera, you would instead specify these via @code{fftw_plan_many_dft}. cannam@95: cannam@95: The analogues to @code{rfftw_create_plan} and @code{rfftw_one} with cannam@95: @code{FFTW_REAL_TO_COMPLEX} or @code{FFTW_COMPLEX_TO_REAL} directions cannam@95: are @code{fftw_plan_r2r_1d} with kind @code{FFTW_R2HC} or cannam@95: @code{FFTW_HC2R}, followed by @code{fftw_execute}. The stride etcetera cannam@95: arguments of @code{rfftw} are now in @code{fftw_plan_many_r2r}. cannam@95: cannam@95: Instead of @code{rfftwnd_create_plan} (or @code{rfftw2d_create_plan} or cannam@95: @code{rfftw3d_create_plan}) followed by cannam@95: @code{rfftwnd_one_real_to_complex} or cannam@95: @code{rfftwnd_one_complex_to_real}, you now use @code{fftw_plan_dft_r2c} cannam@95: (or @code{fftw_plan_dft_r2c_2d} or @code{fftw_plan_dft_r2c_3d}) or cannam@95: @code{fftw_plan_dft_c2r} (or @code{fftw_plan_dft_c2r_2d} or cannam@95: @code{fftw_plan_dft_c2r_3d}), respectively, followed by cannam@95: @code{fftw_execute}. As usual, the strides etcetera of cannam@95: @code{rfftwnd_real_to_complex} or @code{rfftwnd_complex_to_real} are no cannam@95: specified in the advanced planner routines, cannam@95: @code{fftw_plan_many_dft_r2c} or @code{fftw_plan_many_dft_c2r}. cannam@95: cannam@95: @heading Wisdom cannam@95: cannam@95: In FFTW 2, you had to supply the @code{FFTW_USE_WISDOM} flag in order to cannam@95: use wisdom; in FFTW 3, wisdom is always used. (You could simulate the cannam@95: FFTW 2 wisdom-less behavior by calling @code{fftw_forget_wisdom} after cannam@95: every planner call.) cannam@95: cannam@95: The FFTW 3 wisdom import/export routines are almost the same as before cannam@95: (although the storage format is entirely different). There is one cannam@95: significant difference, however. In FFTW 2, the import routines would cannam@95: never read past the end of the wisdom, so you could store extra data cannam@95: beyond the wisdom in the same file, for example. In FFTW 3, the cannam@95: file-import routine may read up to a few hundred bytes past the end of cannam@95: the wisdom, so you cannot store other data just beyond it.@footnote{We cannam@95: do our own buffering because GNU libc I/O routines are horribly slow for cannam@95: single-character I/O, apparently for thread-safety reasons (whether you cannam@95: are using threads or not).} cannam@95: cannam@95: Wisdom has been enhanced by additional humility in FFTW 3: whereas FFTW cannam@95: 2 would re-use wisdom for a given transform size regardless of the cannam@95: stride etc., in FFTW 3 wisdom is only used with the strides etc. for cannam@95: which it was created. Unfortunately, this means FFTW 3 has to create cannam@95: new plans from scratch more often than FFTW 2 (in FFTW 2, planning cannam@95: e.g. one transform of size 1024 also created wisdom for all smaller cannam@95: powers of 2, but this no longer occurs). cannam@95: cannam@95: FFTW 3 also has the new routine @code{fftw_import_system_wisdom} to cannam@95: import wisdom from a standard system-wide location. cannam@95: cannam@95: @heading Memory allocation cannam@95: cannam@95: In FFTW 3, we recommend allocating your arrays with @code{fftw_malloc} cannam@95: and deallocating them with @code{fftw_free}; this is not required, but cannam@95: allows optimal performance when SIMD acceleration is used. (Those two cannam@95: functions actually existed in FFTW 2, and worked the same way, but were cannam@95: not documented.) cannam@95: cannam@95: In FFTW 2, there were @code{fftw_malloc_hook} and @code{fftw_free_hook} cannam@95: functions that allowed the user to replace FFTW's memory-allocation cannam@95: routines (e.g. to implement different error-handling, since by default cannam@95: FFTW prints an error message and calls @code{exit} to abort the program cannam@95: if @code{malloc} returns @code{NULL}). These hooks are not supported in cannam@95: FFTW 3; those few users who require this functionality can just cannam@95: directly modify the memory-allocation routines in FFTW (they are defined cannam@95: in @code{kernel/alloc.c}). cannam@95: cannam@95: @heading Fortran interface cannam@95: cannam@95: In FFTW 2, the subroutine names were obtained by replacing @samp{fftw_} cannam@95: with @samp{fftw_f77}; in FFTW 3, you replace @samp{fftw_} with cannam@95: @samp{dfftw_} (or @samp{sfftw_} or @samp{lfftw_}, depending upon the cannam@95: precision). cannam@95: cannam@95: In FFTW 3, we have begun recommending that you always declare the type cannam@95: used to store plans as @code{integer*8}. (Too many people didn't notice cannam@95: our instruction to switch from @code{integer} to @code{integer*8} for cannam@95: 64-bit machines.) cannam@95: cannam@95: In FFTW 3, we provide a @code{fftw3.f} ``header file'' to include in cannam@95: your code (and which is officially installed on Unix systems). (In FFTW cannam@95: 2, we supplied a @code{fftw_f77.i} file, but it was not installed.) cannam@95: cannam@95: Otherwise, the C-Fortran interface relationship is much the same as it cannam@95: was before (e.g. return values become initial parameters, and cannam@95: multi-dimensional arrays are in column-major order). Unlike FFTW 2, we cannam@95: do provide some support for wisdom import/export in Fortran cannam@95: (@pxref{Wisdom of Fortran?}). cannam@95: cannam@95: @heading Threads cannam@95: cannam@95: Like FFTW 2, only the execution routines are thread-safe. All planner cannam@95: routines, etcetera, should be called by only a single thread at a time cannam@95: (@pxref{Thread safety}). @emph{Unlike} FFTW 2, there is no special cannam@95: @code{FFTW_THREADSAFE} flag for the planner to allow a given plan to be cannam@95: usable by multiple threads in parallel; this is now the case by default. cannam@95: cannam@95: The multi-threaded version of FFTW 2 required you to pass the number of cannam@95: threads each time you execute the transform. The number of threads is cannam@95: now stored in the plan, and is specified before the planner is called by cannam@95: @code{fftw_plan_with_nthreads}. The threads initialization routine used cannam@95: to be called @code{fftw_threads_init} and would return zero on success; cannam@95: the new routine is called @code{fftw_init_threads} and returns zero on cannam@95: failure. @xref{Multi-threaded FFTW}. cannam@95: cannam@95: There is no separate threads header file in FFTW 3; all the function cannam@95: prototypes are in @code{}. However, you still have to link to cannam@95: a separate library (@code{-lfftw3_threads -lfftw3 -lm} on Unix), as well as cannam@95: to the threading library (e.g. POSIX threads on Unix). cannam@95: