Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: FFTW 3.3.5: Fortran-interface routines Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42:
Chris@42:

Chris@42: Next: , Previous: , Up: Calling FFTW from Legacy Fortran   [Contents][Index]

Chris@42:
Chris@42:
Chris@42: Chris@42:

8.1 Fortran-interface routines

Chris@42: Chris@42:

Nearly all of the FFTW functions have Fortran-callable equivalents. Chris@42: The name of the legacy Fortran routine is the same as that of the Chris@42: corresponding C routine, but with the ‘fftw_’ prefix replaced by Chris@42: ‘dfftw_’.9 The single and long-double precision Chris@42: versions use ‘sfftw_’ and ‘lfftw_’, respectively, instead of Chris@42: ‘fftwf_’ and ‘fftwl_’; quadruple precision (real*16) Chris@42: is available on some systems as ‘fftwq_’ (see Precision). Chris@42: (Note that long double on x86 hardware is usually at most Chris@42: 80-bit extended precision, not quadruple precision.) Chris@42:

Chris@42:

For the most part, all of the arguments to the functions are the same, Chris@42: with the following exceptions: Chris@42:

Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42:

In general, you should take care to use Fortran data types that Chris@42: correspond to (i.e. are the same size as) the C types used by FFTW. Chris@42: In practice, this correspondence is usually straightforward Chris@42: (i.e. integer corresponds to int, real Chris@42: corresponds to float, etcetera). The native Fortran Chris@42: double/single-precision complex type should be compatible with Chris@42: fftw_complex/fftwf_complex. Such simple correspondences Chris@42: are assumed in the examples below. Chris@42: Chris@42:

Chris@42:
Chris@42:
Chris@42:

Footnotes

Chris@42: Chris@42:

(9)

Chris@42:

Technically, Fortran 77 identifiers are not Chris@42: allowed to have more than 6 characters, nor may they contain Chris@42: underscores. Any compiler that enforces this limitation doesn’t Chris@42: deserve to link to FFTW.

Chris@42:

(10)

Chris@42:

The Chris@42: reason for this is that some Fortran implementations seem to have Chris@42: trouble with C function return values, and vice versa.

Chris@42:
Chris@42:
Chris@42:
Chris@42:

Chris@42: Next: , Previous: , Up: Calling FFTW from Legacy Fortran   [Contents][Index]

Chris@42:
Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: