Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42: Chris@42:
Chris@42:Chris@42: Next: FFTW MPI Reference, Previous: FFTW MPI Performance Tips, Up: Distributed-memory FFTW with MPI [Contents][Index]
Chris@42:In certain cases, it may be advantageous to combine MPI Chris@42: (distributed-memory) and threads (shared-memory) parallelization. Chris@42: FFTW supports this, with certain caveats. For example, if you have a Chris@42: cluster of 4-processor shared-memory nodes, you may want to use Chris@42: threads within the nodes and MPI between the nodes, instead of MPI for Chris@42: all parallelization. Chris@42:
Chris@42:In particular, it is possible to seamlessly combine the MPI FFTW Chris@42: routines with the multi-threaded FFTW routines (see Multi-threaded FFTW). However, some care must be taken in the initialization code, Chris@42: which should look something like this: Chris@42:
Chris@42:int threads_ok; Chris@42: Chris@42: int main(int argc, char **argv) Chris@42: { Chris@42: int provided; Chris@42: MPI_Init_thread(&argc, &argv, MPI_THREAD_FUNNELED, &provided); Chris@42: threads_ok = provided >= MPI_THREAD_FUNNELED; Chris@42: Chris@42: if (threads_ok) threads_ok = fftw_init_threads(); Chris@42: fftw_mpi_init(); Chris@42: Chris@42: ... Chris@42: if (threads_ok) fftw_plan_with_nthreads(...); Chris@42: ... Chris@42: Chris@42: MPI_Finalize(); Chris@42: } Chris@42:
First, note that instead of calling MPI_Init
, you should call
Chris@42: MPI_Init_threads
, which is the initialization routine defined
Chris@42: by the MPI-2 standard to indicate to MPI that your program will be
Chris@42: multithreaded. We pass MPI_THREAD_FUNNELED
, which indicates
Chris@42: that we will only call MPI routines from the main thread. (FFTW will
Chris@42: launch additional threads internally, but the extra threads will not
Chris@42: call MPI code.) (You may also pass MPI_THREAD_SERIALIZED
or
Chris@42: MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE
, which requests additional multithreading
Chris@42: support from the MPI implementation, but this is not required by
Chris@42: FFTW.) The provided
parameter returns what level of threads
Chris@42: support is actually supported by your MPI implementation; this
Chris@42: must be at least MPI_THREAD_FUNNELED
if you want to call
Chris@42: the FFTW threads routines, so we define a global variable
Chris@42: threads_ok
to record this. You should only call
Chris@42: fftw_init_threads
or fftw_plan_with_nthreads
if
Chris@42: threads_ok
is true. For more information on thread safety in
Chris@42: MPI, see the
Chris@42: MPI and
Chris@42: Threads section of the MPI-2 standard.
Chris@42:
Chris@42:
Second, we must call fftw_init_threads
before
Chris@42: fftw_mpi_init
. This is critical for technical reasons having
Chris@42: to do with how FFTW initializes its list of algorithms.
Chris@42:
Then, if you call fftw_plan_with_nthreads(N)
, every MPI
Chris@42: process will launch (up to) N
threads to parallelize its transforms.
Chris@42:
For example, in the hypothetical cluster of 4-processor nodes, you
Chris@42: might wish to launch only a single MPI process per node, and then call
Chris@42: fftw_plan_with_nthreads(4)
on each process to use all
Chris@42: processors in the nodes.
Chris@42:
This may or may not be faster than simply using as many MPI processes Chris@42: as you have processors, however. On the one hand, using threads Chris@42: within a node eliminates the need for explicit message passing within Chris@42: the node. On the other hand, FFTW’s transpose routines are not Chris@42: multi-threaded, and this means that the communications that do take Chris@42: place will not benefit from parallelization within the node. Chris@42: Moreover, many MPI implementations already have optimizations to Chris@42: exploit shared memory when it is available, so adding the Chris@42: multithreaded FFTW on top of this may be superfluous. Chris@42: Chris@42:
Chris@42:Chris@42: Next: FFTW MPI Reference, Previous: FFTW MPI Performance Tips, Up: Distributed-memory FFTW with MPI [Contents][Index]
Chris@42: