annotate win64-msvc/include/capnp/persistent.capnp @ 58:eab3b14ddc95

Further win32 build updates
author Chris Cannam
date Mon, 09 Jan 2017 13:51:38 +0000
parents d93140aac40b
children
rev   line source
Chris@47 1 # Copyright (c) 2014 Sandstorm Development Group, Inc. and contributors
Chris@47 2 # Licensed under the MIT License:
Chris@47 3 #
Chris@47 4 # Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
Chris@47 5 # of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
Chris@47 6 # in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
Chris@47 7 # to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
Chris@47 8 # copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
Chris@47 9 # furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
Chris@47 10 #
Chris@47 11 # The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
Chris@47 12 # all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
Chris@47 13 #
Chris@47 14 # THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
Chris@47 15 # IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
Chris@47 16 # FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
Chris@47 17 # AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
Chris@47 18 # LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
Chris@47 19 # OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
Chris@47 20 # THE SOFTWARE.
Chris@47 21
Chris@47 22 @0xb8630836983feed7;
Chris@47 23
Chris@47 24 $import "/capnp/c++.capnp".namespace("capnp");
Chris@47 25
Chris@47 26 interface Persistent@0xc8cb212fcd9f5691(SturdyRef, Owner) {
Chris@47 27 # Interface implemented by capabilities that outlive a single connection. A client may save()
Chris@47 28 # the capability, producing a SturdyRef. The SturdyRef can be stored to disk, then later used to
Chris@47 29 # obtain a new reference to the capability on a future connection.
Chris@47 30 #
Chris@47 31 # The exact format of SturdyRef depends on the "realm" in which the SturdyRef appears. A "realm"
Chris@47 32 # is an abstract space in which all SturdyRefs have the same format and refer to the same set of
Chris@47 33 # resources. Every vat is in exactly one realm. All capability clients within that vat must
Chris@47 34 # produce SturdyRefs of the format appropriate for the realm.
Chris@47 35 #
Chris@47 36 # Similarly, every VatNetwork also resides in a particular realm. Usually, a vat's "realm"
Chris@47 37 # corresponds to the realm of its main VatNetwork. However, a Vat can in fact communicate over
Chris@47 38 # a VatNetwork in a different realm -- in this case, all SturdyRefs need to be transformed when
Chris@47 39 # coming or going through said VatNetwork. The RPC system has hooks for registering
Chris@47 40 # transformation callbacks for this purpose.
Chris@47 41 #
Chris@47 42 # Since the format of SturdyRef is realm-dependent, it is not defined here. An application should
Chris@47 43 # choose an appropriate realm for itself as part of its design. Note that under Sandstorm, every
Chris@47 44 # application exists in its own realm and is therefore free to define its own SturdyRef format;
Chris@47 45 # the Sandstorm platform handles translating between realms.
Chris@47 46 #
Chris@47 47 # Note that whether a capability is persistent is often orthogonal to its type. In these cases,
Chris@47 48 # the capability's interface should NOT inherit `Persistent`; instead, just perform a cast at
Chris@47 49 # runtime. It's not type-safe, but trying to be type-safe in these cases will likely lead to
Chris@47 50 # tears. In cases where a particular interface only makes sense on persistent capabilities, it
Chris@47 51 # still should not explicitly inherit Persistent because the `SturdyRef` and `Owner` types will
Chris@47 52 # vary between realms (they may even be different at the call site than they are on the
Chris@47 53 # implementation). Instead, mark persistent interfaces with the $persistent annotation (defined
Chris@47 54 # below).
Chris@47 55 #
Chris@47 56 # Sealing
Chris@47 57 # -------
Chris@47 58 #
Chris@47 59 # As an added security measure, SturdyRefs may be "sealed" to a particular owner, such that
Chris@47 60 # if the SturdyRef itself leaks to a third party, that party cannot actually restore it because
Chris@47 61 # they are not the owner. To restore a sealed capability, you must first prove to its host that
Chris@47 62 # you are the rightful owner. The precise mechanism for this authentication is defined by the
Chris@47 63 # realm.
Chris@47 64 #
Chris@47 65 # Sealing is a defense-in-depth mechanism meant to mitigate damage in the case of catastrophic
Chris@47 66 # attacks. For example, say an attacker temporarily gains read access to a database full of
Chris@47 67 # SturdyRefs: it would be unfortunate if it were then necessary to revoke every single reference
Chris@47 68 # in the database to prevent the attacker from using them.
Chris@47 69 #
Chris@47 70 # In general, an "owner" is a course-grained identity. Because capability-based security is still
Chris@47 71 # the primary mechanism of security, it is not necessary nor desirable to have a separate "owner"
Chris@47 72 # identity for every single process or object; that is exactly what capabilities are supposed to
Chris@47 73 # avoid! Instead, it makes sense for an "owner" to literally identify the owner of the machines
Chris@47 74 # where the capability is stored. If untrusted third parties are able to run arbitrary code on
Chris@47 75 # said machines, then the sandbox for that code should be designed using Distributed Confinement
Chris@47 76 # such that the third-party code never sees the bits of the SturdyRefs and cannot directly
Chris@47 77 # exercise the owner's power to restore refs. See:
Chris@47 78 #
Chris@47 79 # http://www.erights.org/elib/capability/dist-confine.html
Chris@47 80 #
Chris@47 81 # Resist the urge to represent an Owner as a simple public key. The whole point of sealing is to
Chris@47 82 # defend against leaked-storage attacks. Such attacks can easily result in the owner's private
Chris@47 83 # key being stolen as well. A better solution is for `Owner` to contain a simple globally unique
Chris@47 84 # identifier for the owner, and for everyone to separately maintain a mapping of owner IDs to
Chris@47 85 # public keys. If an owner's private key is compromised, then humans will need to communicate
Chris@47 86 # and agree on a replacement public key, then update the mapping.
Chris@47 87 #
Chris@47 88 # As a concrete example, an `Owner` could simply contain a domain name, and restoring a SturdyRef
Chris@47 89 # would require signing a request using the domain's private key. Authenticating this key could
Chris@47 90 # be accomplished through certificate authorities or web-of-trust techniques.
Chris@47 91
Chris@47 92 save @0 SaveParams -> SaveResults;
Chris@47 93 # Save a capability persistently so that it can be restored by a future connection. Not all
Chris@47 94 # capabilities can be saved -- application interfaces should define which capabilities support
Chris@47 95 # this and which do not.
Chris@47 96
Chris@47 97 struct SaveParams {
Chris@47 98 sealFor @0 :Owner;
Chris@47 99 # Seal the SturdyRef so that it can only be restored by the specified Owner. This is meant
Chris@47 100 # to mitigate damage when a SturdyRef is leaked. See comments above.
Chris@47 101 #
Chris@47 102 # Leaving this value null may or may not be allowed; it is up to the realm to decide. If a
Chris@47 103 # realm does allow a null owner, this should indicate that anyone is allowed to restore the
Chris@47 104 # ref.
Chris@47 105 }
Chris@47 106 struct SaveResults {
Chris@47 107 sturdyRef @0 :SturdyRef;
Chris@47 108 }
Chris@47 109 }
Chris@47 110
Chris@47 111 interface RealmGateway(InternalRef, ExternalRef, InternalOwner, ExternalOwner) {
Chris@47 112 # Interface invoked when a SturdyRef is about to cross realms. The RPC system supports providing
Chris@47 113 # a RealmGateway as a callback hook when setting up RPC over some VatNetwork.
Chris@47 114
Chris@47 115 import @0 (cap :Persistent(ExternalRef, ExternalOwner),
Chris@47 116 params :Persistent(InternalRef, InternalOwner).SaveParams)
Chris@47 117 -> Persistent(InternalRef, InternalOwner).SaveResults;
Chris@47 118 # Given an external capability, save it and return an internal reference. Used when someone
Chris@47 119 # inside the realm tries to save a capability from outside the realm.
Chris@47 120
Chris@47 121 export @1 (cap :Persistent(InternalRef, InternalOwner),
Chris@47 122 params :Persistent(ExternalRef, ExternalOwner).SaveParams)
Chris@47 123 -> Persistent(ExternalRef, ExternalOwner).SaveResults;
Chris@47 124 # Given an internal capability, save it and return an external reference. Used when someone
Chris@47 125 # outside the realm tries to save a capability from inside the realm.
Chris@47 126 }
Chris@47 127
Chris@47 128 annotation persistent(interface, field) :Void;
Chris@47 129 # Apply this annotation to interfaces for objects that will always be persistent, instead of
Chris@47 130 # extending the Persistent capability, since the correct type parameters to Persistent depend on
Chris@47 131 # the realm, which is orthogonal to the interface type and therefore should not be defined
Chris@47 132 # along-side it.
Chris@47 133 #
Chris@47 134 # You may also apply this annotation to a capability-typed field which will always contain a
Chris@47 135 # persistent capability, but where the capability's interface itself is not already marked
Chris@47 136 # persistent.
Chris@47 137 #
Chris@47 138 # Note that absence of the $persistent annotation doesn't mean a capability of that type isn't
Chris@47 139 # persistent; it just means not *all* such capabilities are persistent.