annotate osx/include/capnp/persistent.capnp @ 73:02caadb7509e

Rebuild with --disable-stack-protector for mingw32
author Chris Cannam
date Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:31:07 +0000
parents 0994c39f1e94
children
rev   line source
cannam@62 1 # Copyright (c) 2014 Sandstorm Development Group, Inc. and contributors
cannam@62 2 # Licensed under the MIT License:
cannam@62 3 #
cannam@62 4 # Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
cannam@62 5 # of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
cannam@62 6 # in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
cannam@62 7 # to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
cannam@62 8 # copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
cannam@62 9 # furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
cannam@62 10 #
cannam@62 11 # The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
cannam@62 12 # all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
cannam@62 13 #
cannam@62 14 # THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
cannam@62 15 # IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
cannam@62 16 # FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
cannam@62 17 # AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
cannam@62 18 # LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
cannam@62 19 # OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
cannam@62 20 # THE SOFTWARE.
cannam@62 21
cannam@62 22 @0xb8630836983feed7;
cannam@62 23
cannam@62 24 $import "/capnp/c++.capnp".namespace("capnp");
cannam@62 25
cannam@62 26 interface Persistent@0xc8cb212fcd9f5691(SturdyRef, Owner) {
cannam@62 27 # Interface implemented by capabilities that outlive a single connection. A client may save()
cannam@62 28 # the capability, producing a SturdyRef. The SturdyRef can be stored to disk, then later used to
cannam@62 29 # obtain a new reference to the capability on a future connection.
cannam@62 30 #
cannam@62 31 # The exact format of SturdyRef depends on the "realm" in which the SturdyRef appears. A "realm"
cannam@62 32 # is an abstract space in which all SturdyRefs have the same format and refer to the same set of
cannam@62 33 # resources. Every vat is in exactly one realm. All capability clients within that vat must
cannam@62 34 # produce SturdyRefs of the format appropriate for the realm.
cannam@62 35 #
cannam@62 36 # Similarly, every VatNetwork also resides in a particular realm. Usually, a vat's "realm"
cannam@62 37 # corresponds to the realm of its main VatNetwork. However, a Vat can in fact communicate over
cannam@62 38 # a VatNetwork in a different realm -- in this case, all SturdyRefs need to be transformed when
cannam@62 39 # coming or going through said VatNetwork. The RPC system has hooks for registering
cannam@62 40 # transformation callbacks for this purpose.
cannam@62 41 #
cannam@62 42 # Since the format of SturdyRef is realm-dependent, it is not defined here. An application should
cannam@62 43 # choose an appropriate realm for itself as part of its design. Note that under Sandstorm, every
cannam@62 44 # application exists in its own realm and is therefore free to define its own SturdyRef format;
cannam@62 45 # the Sandstorm platform handles translating between realms.
cannam@62 46 #
cannam@62 47 # Note that whether a capability is persistent is often orthogonal to its type. In these cases,
cannam@62 48 # the capability's interface should NOT inherit `Persistent`; instead, just perform a cast at
cannam@62 49 # runtime. It's not type-safe, but trying to be type-safe in these cases will likely lead to
cannam@62 50 # tears. In cases where a particular interface only makes sense on persistent capabilities, it
cannam@62 51 # still should not explicitly inherit Persistent because the `SturdyRef` and `Owner` types will
cannam@62 52 # vary between realms (they may even be different at the call site than they are on the
cannam@62 53 # implementation). Instead, mark persistent interfaces with the $persistent annotation (defined
cannam@62 54 # below).
cannam@62 55 #
cannam@62 56 # Sealing
cannam@62 57 # -------
cannam@62 58 #
cannam@62 59 # As an added security measure, SturdyRefs may be "sealed" to a particular owner, such that
cannam@62 60 # if the SturdyRef itself leaks to a third party, that party cannot actually restore it because
cannam@62 61 # they are not the owner. To restore a sealed capability, you must first prove to its host that
cannam@62 62 # you are the rightful owner. The precise mechanism for this authentication is defined by the
cannam@62 63 # realm.
cannam@62 64 #
cannam@62 65 # Sealing is a defense-in-depth mechanism meant to mitigate damage in the case of catastrophic
cannam@62 66 # attacks. For example, say an attacker temporarily gains read access to a database full of
cannam@62 67 # SturdyRefs: it would be unfortunate if it were then necessary to revoke every single reference
cannam@62 68 # in the database to prevent the attacker from using them.
cannam@62 69 #
cannam@62 70 # In general, an "owner" is a course-grained identity. Because capability-based security is still
cannam@62 71 # the primary mechanism of security, it is not necessary nor desirable to have a separate "owner"
cannam@62 72 # identity for every single process or object; that is exactly what capabilities are supposed to
cannam@62 73 # avoid! Instead, it makes sense for an "owner" to literally identify the owner of the machines
cannam@62 74 # where the capability is stored. If untrusted third parties are able to run arbitrary code on
cannam@62 75 # said machines, then the sandbox for that code should be designed using Distributed Confinement
cannam@62 76 # such that the third-party code never sees the bits of the SturdyRefs and cannot directly
cannam@62 77 # exercise the owner's power to restore refs. See:
cannam@62 78 #
cannam@62 79 # http://www.erights.org/elib/capability/dist-confine.html
cannam@62 80 #
cannam@62 81 # Resist the urge to represent an Owner as a simple public key. The whole point of sealing is to
cannam@62 82 # defend against leaked-storage attacks. Such attacks can easily result in the owner's private
cannam@62 83 # key being stolen as well. A better solution is for `Owner` to contain a simple globally unique
cannam@62 84 # identifier for the owner, and for everyone to separately maintain a mapping of owner IDs to
cannam@62 85 # public keys. If an owner's private key is compromised, then humans will need to communicate
cannam@62 86 # and agree on a replacement public key, then update the mapping.
cannam@62 87 #
cannam@62 88 # As a concrete example, an `Owner` could simply contain a domain name, and restoring a SturdyRef
cannam@62 89 # would require signing a request using the domain's private key. Authenticating this key could
cannam@62 90 # be accomplished through certificate authorities or web-of-trust techniques.
cannam@62 91
cannam@62 92 save @0 SaveParams -> SaveResults;
cannam@62 93 # Save a capability persistently so that it can be restored by a future connection. Not all
cannam@62 94 # capabilities can be saved -- application interfaces should define which capabilities support
cannam@62 95 # this and which do not.
cannam@62 96
cannam@62 97 struct SaveParams {
cannam@62 98 sealFor @0 :Owner;
cannam@62 99 # Seal the SturdyRef so that it can only be restored by the specified Owner. This is meant
cannam@62 100 # to mitigate damage when a SturdyRef is leaked. See comments above.
cannam@62 101 #
cannam@62 102 # Leaving this value null may or may not be allowed; it is up to the realm to decide. If a
cannam@62 103 # realm does allow a null owner, this should indicate that anyone is allowed to restore the
cannam@62 104 # ref.
cannam@62 105 }
cannam@62 106 struct SaveResults {
cannam@62 107 sturdyRef @0 :SturdyRef;
cannam@62 108 }
cannam@62 109 }
cannam@62 110
cannam@62 111 interface RealmGateway(InternalRef, ExternalRef, InternalOwner, ExternalOwner) {
cannam@62 112 # Interface invoked when a SturdyRef is about to cross realms. The RPC system supports providing
cannam@62 113 # a RealmGateway as a callback hook when setting up RPC over some VatNetwork.
cannam@62 114
cannam@62 115 import @0 (cap :Persistent(ExternalRef, ExternalOwner),
cannam@62 116 params :Persistent(InternalRef, InternalOwner).SaveParams)
cannam@62 117 -> Persistent(InternalRef, InternalOwner).SaveResults;
cannam@62 118 # Given an external capability, save it and return an internal reference. Used when someone
cannam@62 119 # inside the realm tries to save a capability from outside the realm.
cannam@62 120
cannam@62 121 export @1 (cap :Persistent(InternalRef, InternalOwner),
cannam@62 122 params :Persistent(ExternalRef, ExternalOwner).SaveParams)
cannam@62 123 -> Persistent(ExternalRef, ExternalOwner).SaveResults;
cannam@62 124 # Given an internal capability, save it and return an external reference. Used when someone
cannam@62 125 # outside the realm tries to save a capability from inside the realm.
cannam@62 126 }
cannam@62 127
cannam@62 128 annotation persistent(interface, field) :Void;
cannam@62 129 # Apply this annotation to interfaces for objects that will always be persistent, instead of
cannam@62 130 # extending the Persistent capability, since the correct type parameters to Persistent depend on
cannam@62 131 # the realm, which is orthogonal to the interface type and therefore should not be defined
cannam@62 132 # along-side it.
cannam@62 133 #
cannam@62 134 # You may also apply this annotation to a capability-typed field which will always contain a
cannam@62 135 # persistent capability, but where the capability's interface itself is not already marked
cannam@62 136 # persistent.
cannam@62 137 #
cannam@62 138 # Note that absence of the $persistent annotation doesn't mean a capability of that type isn't
cannam@62 139 # persistent; it just means not *all* such capabilities are persistent.