annotate workingNotes.rtf @ 6:6f5836d432ca

added confidence measure to each played event and associated match, but not really working yet
author Andrew N Robertson <andrew.robertson@eecs.qmul.ac.uk>
date Fri, 19 Aug 2011 19:42:01 +0100
parents 1a32ce016bb9
children 2ab6f4670cf5
rev   line source
andrew@0 1 {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\cocoartf1038\cocoasubrtf350
andrew@0 2 {\fonttbl\f0\fswiss\fcharset0 Helvetica;}
andrew@0 3 {\colortbl;\red255\green255\blue255;}
andrew@1 4 \paperw11900\paperh16840\margl1440\margr1440\vieww20940\viewh15820\viewkind0
andrew@0 5 \pard\tx566\tx1133\tx1700\tx2267\tx2834\tx3401\tx3968\tx4535\tx5102\tx5669\tx6236\tx6803\ql\qnatural\pardirnatural
andrew@0 6
andrew@0 7 \f0\fs24 \cf0 BUGS:\
andrew@0 8 When prior and posterior etc are split off the screen, it doesn't find the right indices for them. Are we writing the correct prior vector? constrained limits?\
andrew@0 9 \
andrew@0 10 \
andrew@0 11 using best estimate continually - good in the new note on function?\
andrew@0 12 \
andrew@0 13 + + + + + + + + + \
andrew@0 14 \
andrew@0 15 best estimate locked to map so need to free\
andrew@0 16 \
andrew@0 17 need to do relative tempo estimates\
andrew@0 18 \
andrew@1 19 \
andrew@1 20 \
andrew@1 21 works\
andrew@1 22 bartok.mid counterexample:\
andrew@1 23 problem is that the tempo needs to estimate the likelihood confidence that the match is valid\
andrew@1 24 at the moment all are equally weighted.\
andrew@1 25 but if we know that the match is (n, k) then prob(loc_n) the phase at note n - gives us probability that the note is correctly identified.\
andrew@1 26 \
andrew@1 27 \
andrew@1 28 //new note\
andrew@1 29 in comes note\
andrew@1 30 \
andrew@1 31 decay speed distribution - so we have uncertainty about tempo\
andrew@1 32 \
andrew@1 33 cross update - so we have new prior for position}