Mercurial > hg > cip2012
diff draft.tex @ 67:1aaf0e0f2fad
nearly finished... must sleep now.. finish tomorrow.
author | samer |
---|---|
date | Sat, 17 Mar 2012 02:09:17 +0000 |
parents | 6d67c0c11b2b |
children | a8df4a4abe89 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/draft.tex Sat Mar 17 02:00:10 2012 +0000 +++ b/draft.tex Sat Mar 17 02:09:17 2012 +0000 @@ -1054,24 +1054,26 @@ rather than finding a particular spot in the triangle which produces a musically interesting pattern by itself. -Comments collected from the subjects during and after the experiment suggest that +Comments collected from the subjects +%during and after the experiment +suggest that the information-dynamic characteristics of the patterns were readily apparent to most: several noticed the main organisation of the triangle, with repetative notes at the top, cyclic patterns along one edge, and unpredictable -notes towards the opposite corner. Some described their systematic exploration of the space. -Two felt that the right side was more `controllable' than the left (a direct consequence -of their ability to return to a particular periodic pattern and recognise at +notes towards the opposite corner. Some described their consciously systematic exploration of the space. +Two felt that the right side was `more controllable' than the left (a direct consequence +of their ability to return to a particular distinctive pattern and recognise it as one heard previously). Two said that the trial was too long and became bored towards the end, but another felt there wasn't enough time to get to hear out the patterns properly. One subject did not `enjoy' the patterns in the lower region, but another said the lower -regions were more `melodic' and `interesting'. +central regions were more `melodic' and `interesting'. We plan to continue the trials with a slightly less restricted user interface in order make the experience more enjoyable and thereby give subjects longer to use the interface; this may allow them to get beyond the initial exploratory phase and give a clearer picture of their aesthetic preferences. In addition, we plan to conduct a study under more restrictive conditions, where subjects will have no control over the patterns -other than to signal (a) which of two alternatives they prefer in an A/B forced +other than to signal (a) which of two alternatives they prefer in a forced choice paradigm, and (b) when they are bored of listening to a given sequence. %\emph{comparable system} Gordon Pask's Musicolor (1953) applied a similar notion @@ -1090,15 +1092,10 @@ \section{Conclusion} % !!! FIXME -We outlined our information dynamics approach to the modelling of the perception -of music. This approach models the subjective assessments of an observer that -updates its probabilistic model of a process dynamically as events unfold. We -outlined `time-varying' information measures, including a novel `predictive -information rate' that characterises the surprisingness and predictability of -musical patterns. - -We have outlined how information dynamics can serve in three different forms of -analysis; musicological analysis, sound categorisation and beat tracking. +We reviewed our information dynamics approach to the modelling of the perception +of music and have outlined several areas of application, including +musicological analysis, audio analysis, beat tracking, and the generation +of musical materials in a compositional aid. We have described the `Melody Triangle', a novel system that enables a user/composer to discover musical content in terms of the information theoretic properties of