Mercurial > hg > cip2012
comparison draft.tex @ 37:f31433225faa
Minor fixes before bedtime.
author | samer |
---|---|
date | Wed, 14 Mar 2012 23:08:09 +0000 |
parents | ec7d64c0ae44 |
children | 8555ff2232a6 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
36:ec7d64c0ae44 | 37:f31433225faa |
---|---|
643 anomalous; on the basis of a listening analysis, some musicologists [ref] have | 643 anomalous; on the basis of a listening analysis, some musicologists [ref] have |
644 placed the boundary a few bars later, in agreement with our analysis.}. | 644 placed the boundary a few bars later, in agreement with our analysis.}. |
645 | 645 |
646 In contrast, the analyses shown in the lower two plots of \figrf{twopages}, | 646 In contrast, the analyses shown in the lower two plots of \figrf{twopages}, |
647 obtained using two rule-based music segmentation algorithms, while clearly | 647 obtained using two rule-based music segmentation algorithms, while clearly |
648 \emph{reflecting} the structure of the piece, do not \emph{segment} the piece | 648 \emph{reflecting} the structure of the piece, do not \emph{segment} the piece, |
649 clearly, with tendency to peaking of the boundary strength function at | 649 with no tendency to peaking of the boundary strength function at |
650 the boundaries in the piece. | 650 the boundaries in the piece. |
651 | 651 |
652 | 652 |
653 \begin{fig}{metre} | 653 \begin{fig}{metre} |
654 % \scalebox{1}[1]{% | 654 % \scalebox{1}[1]{% |