samer@74
|
1 ** Information dynamics and temporal structure in music **
|
samer@74
|
2
|
samer@74
|
3
|
samer@74
|
4 It has often been observed that one of the more salient effects
|
samer@74
|
5 of listening to music to create expectations within the listener,
|
samer@74
|
6 and that part of the art of making music to create a dynamic interplay
|
samer@74
|
7 of uncertainty, expectation, fulfilment and surprise. It was not until
|
samer@74
|
8 the publication of Shannon's work on information theory, however, that
|
samer@74
|
9 the tools became available to quantify some of these concepts.
|
samer@74
|
10
|
samer@74
|
11 In this talk, we will examine how a small number of
|
samer@74
|
12 \emph{time-varying} information measures, such as entropies and mutual
|
samer@74
|
13 informations, computed in the context
|
samer@74
|
14 of a dynamically evolving probabilistic model, can be used to characterise
|
samer@74
|
15 the temporal structue of a stimulus sequence, considered as a random process
|
samer@74
|
16 from the point of view of a Bayesian observer.
|
samer@74
|
17
|
samer@74
|
18 One such measure is a novel predictive information rate, which we conjecture
|
samer@74
|
19 may provide an explanation for the `inverted-U' relationship often found between
|
samer@74
|
20 simple measures of randomness (\eg entropy rate) and
|
samer@74
|
21 judgements of aesthetic value [Berlyne 1971]. We explore these ideas in the context
|
samer@74
|
22 of Markov chains using both artificially generated sequences and
|
samer@74
|
23 two pieces of minimalist music by Philip Glass, showing that even an overly simple
|
samer@74
|
24 model (the Markov chain), when interpreted according to information dynamic
|
samer@74
|
25 principles, produces a structural analysis which largely agrees with that of an
|
samer@74
|
26 human expert listener and improves on those generated by rule-based methods.
|
samer@74
|
27
|