Mercurial > hg > camir-aes2014
diff toolboxes/FullBNT-1.0.7/bnt/examples/static/Zoubin/mfademo.m @ 0:e9a9cd732c1e tip
first hg version after svn
author | wolffd |
---|---|
date | Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:05:51 +0000 |
parents | |
children |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/toolboxes/FullBNT-1.0.7/bnt/examples/static/Zoubin/mfademo.m Tue Feb 10 15:05:51 2015 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +echo on; + +clc; + +% This is a very basic demo of the mixture of factor analyzer software +% written in Matlab by Zoubin Ghahramani +% Dept of Computer Science +% University of Toronto + +pause; % Hit any key to continue + +% To demonstrate the software we generate a sample data set +% from a mixture of two Gaussians + +pause; % Hit any key to continue + +X1=randn(300,5); % zero mean 5 dim Gaussian data +X2=randn(200,5)+2; % 5 dim Gaussian data with mean [1 1 1 1 1] +X=[X1;X2]; % total 500 data points from mixture + +% Fitting the model is very easy. For example to fit a mixture of 2 +% factor analyzers with three factors each... + +pause; % Hit any key to continue + + +[Lh,Ph,Mu,Pi,LL]=mfa(X,2,3); + +% Lh, Ph, Mu, and Pi are the factor loadings, observervation +% variances, observation means for each mixture, and mixing +% proportions. LL is the vector of log likelihoods (the learning +% curve). For more information type: help mfa + +% to plot the learning curve (log likelihood at each step of EM)... + +pause; % Hit any key to continue + +plot(LL); + +% you get a more informative picture of convergence by looking at the +% log of the first difference of the log likelihoods... + +pause; % Hit any key to continue + +semilogy(diff(LL)); + +% you can look at some of the parameters of the fitted model... + +pause; % Hit any key to continue + +Mu + +Pi + +% ...to see whether they make any sense given that me know how the +% data was generated. + +% you can also evaluate the log likelihood of another data set under +% the model we have just fitted using the mfa_cl (for Calculate +% Likelihood) function. For example, here we generate a test from the +% same distribution. + + +X1=randn(300,5); +X2=randn(200,5)+2; +Xtest=[X1; X2]; + +pause; % Hit any key to continue + +mfa_cl(Xtest,Lh,Ph,Mu,Pi) + +% we should expect the log likelihood of the test set to be lower than +% that of the training set. + +% finally, we can also fit a regular factor analyzer using the ffa +% function (Fast Factor Analysis)... + +pause; % Hit any key to continue + +[L,Ph,LL]=ffa(X,3); +