Mercurial > hg > camir-aes2014
comparison toolboxes/FullBNT-1.0.7/bnt/examples/static/Zoubin/mfademo.m @ 0:e9a9cd732c1e tip
first hg version after svn
author | wolffd |
---|---|
date | Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:05:51 +0000 |
parents | |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
-1:000000000000 | 0:e9a9cd732c1e |
---|---|
1 echo on; | |
2 | |
3 clc; | |
4 | |
5 % This is a very basic demo of the mixture of factor analyzer software | |
6 % written in Matlab by Zoubin Ghahramani | |
7 % Dept of Computer Science | |
8 % University of Toronto | |
9 | |
10 pause; % Hit any key to continue | |
11 | |
12 % To demonstrate the software we generate a sample data set | |
13 % from a mixture of two Gaussians | |
14 | |
15 pause; % Hit any key to continue | |
16 | |
17 X1=randn(300,5); % zero mean 5 dim Gaussian data | |
18 X2=randn(200,5)+2; % 5 dim Gaussian data with mean [1 1 1 1 1] | |
19 X=[X1;X2]; % total 500 data points from mixture | |
20 | |
21 % Fitting the model is very easy. For example to fit a mixture of 2 | |
22 % factor analyzers with three factors each... | |
23 | |
24 pause; % Hit any key to continue | |
25 | |
26 | |
27 [Lh,Ph,Mu,Pi,LL]=mfa(X,2,3); | |
28 | |
29 % Lh, Ph, Mu, and Pi are the factor loadings, observervation | |
30 % variances, observation means for each mixture, and mixing | |
31 % proportions. LL is the vector of log likelihoods (the learning | |
32 % curve). For more information type: help mfa | |
33 | |
34 % to plot the learning curve (log likelihood at each step of EM)... | |
35 | |
36 pause; % Hit any key to continue | |
37 | |
38 plot(LL); | |
39 | |
40 % you get a more informative picture of convergence by looking at the | |
41 % log of the first difference of the log likelihoods... | |
42 | |
43 pause; % Hit any key to continue | |
44 | |
45 semilogy(diff(LL)); | |
46 | |
47 % you can look at some of the parameters of the fitted model... | |
48 | |
49 pause; % Hit any key to continue | |
50 | |
51 Mu | |
52 | |
53 Pi | |
54 | |
55 % ...to see whether they make any sense given that me know how the | |
56 % data was generated. | |
57 | |
58 % you can also evaluate the log likelihood of another data set under | |
59 % the model we have just fitted using the mfa_cl (for Calculate | |
60 % Likelihood) function. For example, here we generate a test from the | |
61 % same distribution. | |
62 | |
63 | |
64 X1=randn(300,5); | |
65 X2=randn(200,5)+2; | |
66 Xtest=[X1; X2]; | |
67 | |
68 pause; % Hit any key to continue | |
69 | |
70 mfa_cl(Xtest,Lh,Ph,Mu,Pi) | |
71 | |
72 % we should expect the log likelihood of the test set to be lower than | |
73 % that of the training set. | |
74 | |
75 % finally, we can also fit a regular factor analyzer using the ffa | |
76 % function (Fast Factor Analysis)... | |
77 | |
78 pause; % Hit any key to continue | |
79 | |
80 [L,Ph,LL]=ffa(X,3); | |
81 |