annotate core/magnatagatune/makro_cupaper12_get_significance.m @ 0:e9a9cd732c1e tip

first hg version after svn
author wolffd
date Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:05:51 +0000
parents
children
rev   line source
wolffd@0 1 % makro_get_significance_cupaper
wolffd@0 2 %%
wolffd@0 3 % ------------------------------ Algorithms Compared id-sampling
wolffd@0 4 % ---
wolffd@0 5 'mlr vs euclidean, mlr all average feat, ID-sampling'
wolffd@0 6 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1a58077f1232c33b787b661039df107d_finalresults';
wolffd@0 7
wolffd@0 8 % euclidean average feat - TODO: which sampling is this ?
wolffd@0 9 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1a9788c5e14f30e23ed2a05dbf513c9f_finalresults';
wolffd@0 10 % ---
wolffd@0 11 % NOTE: all 4 test-set runs have exactly the same result
wolffd@0 12 % ---
wolffd@0 13 run1 = -1;
wolffd@0 14 run2 = -1;
wolffd@0 15 mode = 'join_datasets'; % '', 'avgbase', 'join_datasets'
wolffd@0 16 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run1,0,mode);
wolffd@0 17 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 18
wolffd@0 19
wolffd@0 20 %%
wolffd@0 21 % ---
wolffd@0 22 'SVM vs euclidean, SVM all average feat, ID-sampling'
wolffd@0 23 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults';
wolffd@0 24
wolffd@0 25 % euclidean average feat - TODO: which sampling is this ?
wolffd@0 26 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1a9788c5e14f30e23ed2a05dbf513c9f_finalresults';
wolffd@0 27
wolffd@0 28 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2,0,mode);
wolffd@0 29 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 30
wolffd@0 31 %%
wolffd@0 32 % ------------------------------ Algorithms Compared TD-sampling
wolffd@0 33 % ---
wolffd@0 34 'mlr unclustered vs euclidean unclustered, mlr all average feat TD-sampling'
wolffd@0 35 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_c364cb0803822d55f2940656c44b184d_finalresults';
wolffd@0 36
wolffd@0 37 % euclidean average feat TD-sampling
wolffd@0 38 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_72303bfa642aad872665dee7a3b1e28c_finalresults';
wolffd@0 39
wolffd@0 40 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2,0,mode);
wolffd@0 41 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 42
wolffd@0 43 %%
wolffd@0 44 % ---
wolffd@0 45 'SVM unclustered vs euclidean unclustered, SVM all average feat TD-sampling'
wolffd@0 46 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_3434f0534fa910b26bbf927c65a7fb74_finalresults';
wolffd@0 47
wolffd@0 48 % euclidean average feat TD-sampling
wolffd@0 49 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_72303bfa642aad872665dee7a3b1e28c_finalresults';
wolffd@0 50 % ---
wolffd@0 51
wolffd@0 52 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2,0,mode);
wolffd@0 53 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 54
wolffd@0 55
wolffd@0 56 %%
wolffd@0 57 % ------------------------------ Features Compared
wolffd@0 58 'All 12-dim PCA Features compared'
wolffd@0 59 % ---
wolffd@0 60 namePCA12 = {'AcousticPCA12', ...
wolffd@0 61 'Slaney08PCA12', ...
wolffd@0 62 'TimbrePCA12', ...
wolffd@0 63 'ChromaPCA12', ...
wolffd@0 64 'AllPCA12', ...
wolffd@0 65 'GenrePCA12'};
wolffd@0 66 % this is the index how the feature types appear in the paper
wolffd@0 67 paperidx = [4 3 2 6 1 5];
wolffd@0 68
wolffd@0 69 filePCA12 = {'runlog_a18bd2111694ac59c9ba0a6810121796_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 70 'runlog_37e47c187886f73ec9a7d8dc24a84a52_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 71 'runlog_4c6787b403a07f5faf1ec26e891da4fa_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 72 'runlog_c5566f74e6a0d00b50f5eea05fdacfee_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 73 'runlog_e2c22696e7af9e7eea1fa1fd10a1f785_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 74 'runlog_efc6e5e9c56291cd1744092a1c59a293_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults'};
wolffd@0 75
wolffd@0 76
wolffd@0 77 namePCA12 = namePCA12(paperidx);
wolffd@0 78 filePCA12 = filePCA12(paperidx);
wolffd@0 79
wolffd@0 80 p = zeros(numel(namePCA12),numel(namePCA12));
wolffd@0 81 med = zeros(numel(namePCA12),numel(namePCA12));
wolffd@0 82 avg = zeros(numel(namePCA12),numel(namePCA12));
wolffd@0 83 for i=1:numel(name)
wolffd@0 84 for j = 1:i-1
wolffd@0 85 [p(i,j), med(i,j), avg(i,j)] = test_generic_significance_signrank(filePCA12{i},-1,filePCA12{j},-1,0,mode);
wolffd@0 86 end
wolffd@0 87 % p(i,i) = 0.5;
wolffd@0 88 end
wolffd@0 89 % p = p + p';
wolffd@0 90 imagesc(p);
wolffd@0 91 colormap(hot)
wolffd@0 92 axis xy
wolffd@0 93 set(gca,'XTick',1:numel(namePCA12), 'XTickLabel', namePCA12);
wolffd@0 94 set(gca,'YTick',1:numel(namePCA12), 'YTickLabel', namePCA12);
wolffd@0 95 matrix2latex(p,'%1.3f')
wolffd@0 96
wolffd@0 97 %%
wolffd@0 98 'All 52-dim PCA Features compared'
wolffd@0 99 % ---
wolffd@0 100 namePCA52 = {'GenrePCA52', ...
wolffd@0 101 'AllPCA52', ...
wolffd@0 102 'TimbrePCA52', ...
wolffd@0 103 'AcousticPCA52', ...
wolffd@0 104 'ChromaPCA52' ...
wolffd@0 105 };
wolffd@0 106 % this is the index how the feature types appear in the paper
wolffd@0 107 paperidx = [5 3 1 4 2];
wolffd@0 108
wolffd@0 109 filePCA52 = {'runlog_3cbf4759cf58af0728aaab0b5f2660e3_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 110 'runlog_7d5fafec0dc504215acc8cb7a9202a56_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 111 'runlog_a3c2c0a5742a42fd54497e69b8f44e8d_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 112 'runlog_c7164074206998aa184538bedcfdcf2f_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 113 'runlog_efbf7c8e75ae154c2f192acd08fbdcbc_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults' ...
wolffd@0 114 };
wolffd@0 115
wolffd@0 116
wolffd@0 117 namePCA52 = namePCA52(paperidx);
wolffd@0 118 filePCA52 = filePCA52(paperidx);
wolffd@0 119
wolffd@0 120 p = zeros(numel(namePCA52),numel(namePCA52));
wolffd@0 121 med = zeros(numel(namePCA52),numel(namePCA52));
wolffd@0 122 avg = zeros(numel(namePCA52),numel(namePCA52));
wolffd@0 123 for i=1:numel(name)
wolffd@0 124 for j = 1:i-1
wolffd@0 125 [p(i,j), med(i,j), avg(i,j)] = test_generic_significance_signrank(...
wolffd@0 126 filePCA52{i},run1,filePCA52{j},run2,0,mode);
wolffd@0 127 end
wolffd@0 128 % p(i,i) = 0.5;
wolffd@0 129 end
wolffd@0 130 % p = p + p';
wolffd@0 131 imagesc(p);
wolffd@0 132 colormap(hot)
wolffd@0 133 axis xy
wolffd@0 134 set(gca,'XTick',1:numel(namePCA52), 'XTickLabel', namePCA52);
wolffd@0 135 set(gca,'YTick',1:numel(namePCA52), 'YTickLabel', namePCA52);
wolffd@0 136 matrix2latex(p,'%1.3f')
wolffd@0 137
wolffd@0 138 %%
wolffd@0 139 'All full-dim Features compared (SVM)'
wolffd@0 140 % ---
wolffd@0 141 name = {'4Chroma', ...
wolffd@0 142 '1Chroma', ...
wolffd@0 143 '4Timbre', ...
wolffd@0 144 '1Timbre', ...
wolffd@0 145 '1Acoustic', ...
wolffd@0 146 'Genre', ...
wolffd@0 147 'Slaney08', ...
wolffd@0 148 '1All', ...
wolffd@0 149 '4All', ...
wolffd@0 150 '4Acoustic' ...
wolffd@0 151 };
wolffd@0 152
wolffd@0 153 % this is the index how the feature types appear in the paper
wolffd@0 154 % Features & Chroma(1/4) & Timbre(1/4) & Slaney08 & Genre & Comb. Audio (1/4) & Comb. All(1/4) \\
wolffd@0 155 paperidx = [2 1 4 3 7 6 5 10 8 9];
wolffd@0 156
wolffd@0 157 file = {'runlog_20a2f6a0f20f488e9386ebb8c5026fcf_85c439d9ef3d135936e7645ebc0efe36_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 158 'runlog_20a2f6a0f20f488e9386ebb8c5026fcf_85c439d9ef3d135936e7645ebc0efe36_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 159 'runlog_3154f36c34c18f60218c5d3f0c0b5931_85c439d9ef3d135936e7645ebc0efe36_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 160 'runlog_3154f36c34c18f60218c5d3f0c0b5931_85c439d9ef3d135936e7645ebc0efe36_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 161 'runlog_31981d48dd0d25564ef3c2b3ca650b3b_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 162 'runlog_37867d3b5bd4c74b7b548732b80fb947_85c439d9ef3d135936e7645ebc0efe36_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 163 'runlog_f52d37439805ac4edc70b0432281abc3_85c439d9ef3d135936e7645ebc0efe36_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 164 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 165 'runlog_800d97be9ef6274dc3bbe6b9be2406a6_1a58077f1232c33b787b661039df107d_finalresults', ...
wolffd@0 166 'runlog_cf5a61cca09e2a3182b794b70ee1ab91_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults' ...
wolffd@0 167 };
wolffd@0 168
wolffd@0 169 sets2join = {[1:4],[5:8],[1:4],[5:8],[],[],[],[],[],[]};
wolffd@0 170
wolffd@0 171 name = name(paperidx);
wolffd@0 172 file = file(paperidx);
wolffd@0 173
wolffd@0 174 p = zeros(numel(name),numel(name));
wolffd@0 175 med = zeros(numel(name),numel(name));
wolffd@0 176 avg = zeros(numel(name),numel(name));
wolffd@0 177 for i=1:numel(name)
wolffd@0 178 for j = 1:i-1
wolffd@0 179 [p(i,j), med(i,j), avg(i,j)] = test_generic_significance_signrank(...
wolffd@0 180 file{i},sets2join{i},file{j},sets2join{j},0,mode);
wolffd@0 181 end
wolffd@0 182 % p(i,i) = 0.5;
wolffd@0 183 end
wolffd@0 184 p = flipud(p);
wolffd@0 185 % p = p + p';
wolffd@0 186 imagesc(p);
wolffd@0 187 colormap(hot)
wolffd@0 188 axis ij
wolffd@0 189 set(gca,'XTick',1:numel(name), 'XTickLabel', name);
wolffd@0 190 set(gca,'YTick',1:numel(name), 'YTickLabel', fliplr(name));
wolffd@0 191 matrix2latex(p,'%1.3f')
wolffd@0 192
wolffd@0 193 %%
wolffd@0 194 'Comparing Feature dimensions and PCA effect on combined all features'
wolffd@0 195 % ---
wolffd@0 196 % 'SVM all average feat, ID-sampling'
wolffd@0 197 allavg = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults';
wolffd@0 198
wolffd@0 199 % 'SVM 4 cluster feat, ID-sampling'
wolffd@0 200 allfourcluster = 'runlog_800d97be9ef6274dc3bbe6b9be2406a6_1a58077f1232c33b787b661039df107d_finalresults';
wolffd@0 201
wolffd@0 202 % 'SVM 12dim feat, ID-sampling'
wolffd@0 203 pca12 = 'runlog_e2c22696e7af9e7eea1fa1fd10a1f785_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults';
wolffd@0 204
wolffd@0 205 % 'SVM 52dim feat, ID-sampling'
wolffd@0 206 pca52 = 'runlog_7d5fafec0dc504215acc8cb7a9202a56_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults';
wolffd@0 207 % ---
wolffd@0 208 % NOTE: all 4 test-set runs have exactly the same result
wolffd@0 209 % ---
wolffd@0 210 run1 = -1;
wolffd@0 211 run2 = -1;
wolffd@0 212 mode = 'join_datasets'; % '', 'avgbase', 'join_datasets'
wolffd@0 213
wolffd@0 214 'AllAvg vs Pca12'
wolffd@0 215 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(allavg,run1,pca12,run2,0,mode);
wolffd@0 216 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 217
wolffd@0 218 'AllAvg vs pca52'
wolffd@0 219 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(allavg,run1,pca52,run2,0,mode);
wolffd@0 220 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 221
wolffd@0 222 'Pca12 vs pca52'
wolffd@0 223 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(pca12,run1,pca52,run2,0,mode);
wolffd@0 224 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 225
wolffd@0 226
wolffd@0 227 %%
wolffd@0 228 % ------------------------------ Algorithms Weighted Training Weighted Performance Compared
wolffd@0 229 'MLR t:w,e:w vs euclidean t:w,e:w'
wolffd@0 230 % ---
wolffd@0 231 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_3cdcca7596fed97f87b0ec051cb8bba0_finalresults';
wolffd@0 232
wolffd@0 233 % euclidean baseline, file same as the unweighted above
wolffd@0 234 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1a9788c5e14f30e23ed2a05dbf513c9f_finalresults';
wolffd@0 235 % ---
wolffd@0 236 % NOTE: using the "weighted" parameter here
wolffd@0 237 % ---
wolffd@0 238 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2, 1 ,mode);
wolffd@0 239 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 240
wolffd@0 241 %%
wolffd@0 242 'DMLR t:w,e:w vs euclidean t:w,e:w'
wolffd@0 243 % ---
wolffd@0 244 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1cc76d534804229cbdec8b20f8b75dba_finalresults';
wolffd@0 245
wolffd@0 246 % euclidean baseline, file same as the unweighted above
wolffd@0 247 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1a9788c5e14f30e23ed2a05dbf513c9f_finalresults';
wolffd@0 248 % ---
wolffd@0 249 % NOTE: using the "weighted" parameter here
wolffd@0 250 % ---
wolffd@0 251 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2, 1 ,mode);
wolffd@0 252 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 253
wolffd@0 254 %%
wolffd@0 255 'SVM t:w,e:w vs euclidean t:w,e:w'
wolffd@0 256 % ---
wolffd@0 257 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_9bd9ccddb2e4e622e2ba9826466442ba_finalresults';
wolffd@0 258
wolffd@0 259 % euclidean baseline, file same as the unweighted above
wolffd@0 260 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1a9788c5e14f30e23ed2a05dbf513c9f_finalresults';
wolffd@0 261 % ---
wolffd@0 262 % NOTE: using the "weighted" parameter here
wolffd@0 263 % ---
wolffd@0 264 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2, 1 ,mode);
wolffd@0 265 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 266
wolffd@0 267 %%
wolffd@0 268 % ------------------------------ Algorithms Weighted Training UNWEIGHTED Performance Compared
wolffd@0 269 'MLR t:w,e:uw vs euclidean t:w,e:uw'
wolffd@0 270 % ---
wolffd@0 271 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_3cdcca7596fed97f87b0ec051cb8bba0_finalresults';
wolffd@0 272
wolffd@0 273 % euclidean baseline, file same as the unweighted above
wolffd@0 274 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1a9788c5e14f30e23ed2a05dbf513c9f_finalresults';
wolffd@0 275 % ---
wolffd@0 276 % NOTE: using the "weighted" parameter here
wolffd@0 277 % ---
wolffd@0 278 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2, 0 ,mode);
wolffd@0 279 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 280
wolffd@0 281 %%
wolffd@0 282 'DMLR t:w,e:uw vs euclidean t:w,e:uw'
wolffd@0 283 % ---
wolffd@0 284 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1cc76d534804229cbdec8b20f8b75dba_finalresults';
wolffd@0 285
wolffd@0 286 % euclidean baseline, file same as the unweighted above
wolffd@0 287 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1a9788c5e14f30e23ed2a05dbf513c9f_finalresults';
wolffd@0 288 % ---
wolffd@0 289 % NOTE: using the "weighted" parameter here
wolffd@0 290 % ---
wolffd@0 291 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2, 0 ,mode);
wolffd@0 292 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 293
wolffd@0 294 %%
wolffd@0 295 'SVM t:w,e:uw vs euclidean t:w,e:uw'
wolffd@0 296 % ---
wolffd@0 297 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_9bd9ccddb2e4e622e2ba9826466442ba_finalresults';
wolffd@0 298
wolffd@0 299 % euclidean baseline, file same as the unweighted above
wolffd@0 300 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1a9788c5e14f30e23ed2a05dbf513c9f_finalresults';
wolffd@0 301 % ---
wolffd@0 302 % NOTE: using the "weighted" parameter here
wolffd@0 303 % ---
wolffd@0 304 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2, 0 ,mode);
wolffd@0 305 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 306
wolffd@0 307
wolffd@0 308 %%
wolffd@0 309 % ------------------------------ Algorithms w / uw Training WEIGHTED Performance Compared
wolffd@0 310 'MLR t:w,e:w vs MLR t:uw,e:w'
wolffd@0 311 % ---
wolffd@0 312 % MLR t:w,e:w
wolffd@0 313 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_3cdcca7596fed97f87b0ec051cb8bba0_finalresults';
wolffd@0 314
wolffd@0 315 % MLR t:uw,e:w
wolffd@0 316 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1a58077f1232c33b787b661039df107d_finalresults';
wolffd@0 317 % ---
wolffd@0 318 % NOTE: using the "weighted" parameter here
wolffd@0 319 % ---
wolffd@0 320 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2, 1 ,mode);
wolffd@0 321 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 322
wolffd@0 323 %%
wolffd@0 324 % ---
wolffd@0 325 'SVM t:w,e:w vs SVM t:uw,e:w'
wolffd@0 326 % ---
wolffd@0 327 % SVM t:w,e:w
wolffd@0 328 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_9bd9ccddb2e4e622e2ba9826466442ba_finalresults';
wolffd@0 329
wolffd@0 330 % SVM t:uw,e:w
wolffd@0 331 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1841892e9df07039bbe4c3a55d11026a_finalresults';
wolffd@0 332 % ---
wolffd@0 333 % NOTE: using the "weighted" parameter here
wolffd@0 334 % ---
wolffd@0 335 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2, 1 ,mode);
wolffd@0 336 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);
wolffd@0 337
wolffd@0 338 %%
wolffd@0 339 % ------------------------------ Algorithms w / uw Training WEIGHTED Performance Compared
wolffd@0 340 'DMLR t:w,e:w vs DMLR t:uw,e:w'
wolffd@0 341 % ---
wolffd@0 342 % DMLR t:w,e:w
wolffd@0 343 file1 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_1cc76d534804229cbdec8b20f8b75dba_finalresults';
wolffd@0 344
wolffd@0 345 % DMLR t:uw,e:w
wolffd@0 346 file2 = 'runlog_0b506247a68167addf97fcb0296650eb_bf08b16f453683d96ddffc31c6439730_finalresults';
wolffd@0 347 % ---
wolffd@0 348 % NOTE: using the "weighted" parameter here
wolffd@0 349 % ---
wolffd@0 350 [p, med, avg] = test_generic_significance_signrank(file1,run1,file2,run2, 1 ,mode);
wolffd@0 351 fprintf('p = %3.4f, median = %3.4f, avg = %3.4f \n\n',p,med,avg);