Mercurial > hg > batch-feature-extraction-tool
diff Lib/fftw-3.2.1/doc/html/.svn/text-base/Stack-alignment-on-x86.html.svn-base @ 0:25bf17994ef1
First commit. VS2013, Codeblocks and Mac OSX configuration
author | Geogaddi\David <d.m.ronan@qmul.ac.uk> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 09 Jul 2015 01:12:16 +0100 |
parents | |
children |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/Lib/fftw-3.2.1/doc/html/.svn/text-base/Stack-alignment-on-x86.html.svn-base Thu Jul 09 01:12:16 2015 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +<html lang="en"> +<head> +<title>Stack alignment on x86 - FFTW 3.2.1</title> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html"> +<meta name="description" content="FFTW 3.2.1"> +<meta name="generator" content="makeinfo 4.8"> +<link title="Top" rel="start" href="index.html#Top"> +<link rel="up" href="Data-Alignment.html#Data-Alignment" title="Data Alignment"> +<link rel="prev" href="SIMD-alignment-and-fftw_005fmalloc.html#SIMD-alignment-and-fftw_005fmalloc" title="SIMD alignment and fftw_malloc"> +<link href="http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/" rel="generator-home" title="Texinfo Homepage"> +<!-- +This manual is for FFTW +(version 3.2.1, 5 February 2009). + +Copyright (C) 2003 Matteo Frigo. + +Copyright (C) 2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. + + Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of + this manual provided the copyright notice and this permission + notice are preserved on all copies. + + Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of + this manual under the conditions for verbatim copying, provided + that the entire resulting derived work is distributed under the + terms of a permission notice identical to this one. + + Permission is granted to copy and distribute translations of this + manual into another language, under the above conditions for + modified versions, except that this permission notice may be + stated in a translation approved by the Free Software Foundation. + --> +<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css"> +<style type="text/css"><!-- + pre.display { font-family:inherit } + pre.format { font-family:inherit } + pre.smalldisplay { font-family:inherit; font-size:smaller } + pre.smallformat { font-family:inherit; font-size:smaller } + pre.smallexample { font-size:smaller } + pre.smalllisp { font-size:smaller } + span.sc { font-variant:small-caps } + span.roman { font-family:serif; font-weight:normal; } + span.sansserif { font-family:sans-serif; font-weight:normal; } +--></style> +</head> +<body> +<div class="node"> +<p> +<a name="Stack-alignment-on-x86"></a> +Previous: <a rel="previous" accesskey="p" href="SIMD-alignment-and-fftw_005fmalloc.html#SIMD-alignment-and-fftw_005fmalloc">SIMD alignment and fftw_malloc</a>, +Up: <a rel="up" accesskey="u" href="Data-Alignment.html#Data-Alignment">Data Alignment</a> +<hr> +</div> + +<h4 class="subsection">3.1.2 Stack alignment on x86</h4> + +<p>On the Pentium and subsequent x86 processors, there is a substantial +performance penalty if double-precision variables are not stored +8-byte aligned; a factor of two or more is not unusual. +Unfortunately, the stack (the place that local variables and +subroutine arguments live) is not guaranteed by the Intel ABI to be +8-byte aligned. + + <p>Recent versions of <code>gcc</code> (as well as most other compilers, we are +told, such as Intel's, Metrowerks', and Microsoft's) are able to keep +the stack 8-byte aligned; <code>gcc</code> does this by default (see +<code>-mpreferred-stack-boundary</code> in the <code>gcc</code> documentation). +If you are not certain whether your compiler maintains stack alignment +by default, it is a good idea to make sure. + + <p>Unfortunately, <code>gcc</code> only <em>preserves</em> the stack +alignment—as a result, if the stack starts off misaligned, it will +always be misaligned, with a disastrous effect on performance (in +double precision). To prevent this, FFTW includes hacks to align its +own stack if necessary, so it should perform well even if you call it +from a program with a misaligned stack. Currently, our hacks support +<code>gcc</code> and the Intel C compiler; if you use another compiler you +are on your own. Fortunately, recent versions of glibc (on GNU/Linux) +provide a properly-aligned starting stack, but this was not the case +with a number of older versions, and we are not certain of the +situation on other operating systems. Hopefully, as time goes by this +will become less of a concern. + +<!-- --> +</body></html> +